i dont quite understand how people here ( nor anywhere else ) can suggest its only females /others elsewhere ??that are ruled by their emotions , when theres so much reference used here to the alleged PERSONAL qualities of individual posters ( or others ) ,( ad hominum / personal discreditation tactics – very female !) rather than sticking to actually addressing / arguing / judging the actual issues .

the problem isnt the body a person is in , its being locked into an extreme right ( female brained ) subjective frame of mind that refuses to stand accountable to the left brained ( analytical , logical , objectivity seeking ) side of us .

truth from the mouth of a donkey ( or even a woman ? ) is still just as true as waffle from a prophet … and vice versa. lets not fall victim to the very thing we are trying to bring balance back into . emotionalism of any kind is a terrorist activity .
its blackmailing in the way it uses offence and other emotional products as weapons against the quest for or proclkamatiuon of any kind of objective reality .
without Truth , there can be no justice , and there can be no truth if the whole concept of Truth is this anarcistic desire to remain unaccountable , even to self ,for ones ideas , thoughts and most of all ?? emotions .

I am not saying that I support all feminists per se, but I do support the feminist cause, i.e., the freedom to enjoy whatever sexual role one wishes in any given society so long as it does not harm others or, if uninformed, harm oneself.

Unfortunately, that is often misunderstood by both those claiming to be feminists (hence me not supporting all feminists) and those people of your condition, people who cannot make such distinctions, people who are have somehow been damned to make unfounded out-group blanket distinctions. How the treatment of a majority of the world’s population that comprises women, male homosexuals and all of the rest of the people you so callously group together, as a solitary unit could be claimed to be “base(d)… on logic,facts and sound judgement” is beyond me.

I am sure that your rebuttal will include the labeling of me as a homosexual, which, though it is of no consequence, I am not, or an imbecile or some other weak attempt to undermine what I say with slander; after all, if the argument cannot be defeated, attack the person, right? Better yet, this comment will be censored, perhaps justifying this with me not giving out my email address. Seriously, who would want to give a person of your condition their email address?

What is most shocking to me is that your condition has brought you as far as putting the “Men Can Stop Rape” sign on your object to burn list. I cannot–nor am I willing to–get into your mindset enough to even try understand a justification for this. Is it that you are of the belief that women are the only ones responsible for being raped or that all rape claims are fraudulent or that rape is fair game? If it is any of these, then this is perverse. Indeed, there are fraudulent rape claims, but, when anyone decides to not to have intercourse, be it before or during the act, then it is the would-be partner’s duty to oblige, no matter the circumstances. A person’s body is the one thing over which s/he maintains sovereignty.

As far as Russia goes, your fascination for it is regrettable. It is a wonderful country–I should know, I speak the language fluently, have lived there for two years, am soon to be married to a citizen of a former Soviet Republic and, as an graduate student in economic sociology with an master’s degree in Russian Studies, the latter acquired in Russia–but it had enough problems as it were before you arrived. (Strange how, philosophically speaking, your prose on Siberia is ascetically feminist.) If only your fascination were to turn inward, towards your condition, i.e., that which has brought you to the point of needing to out-group.

I sincerely hope that you will take some time to analyse this last point. It is unfortunate that you have been somehow brought to a point that making such a website seems valid to you. If only you could figure out your own motivations for this and the causes for those motivations (I mean the real ones stemming from childhood or experiences with the opposite sex or whatever else they could be, not some bogus denigration of women or anyone else), maybe you will find contentment.

I wish you the best (and, yes I know my closing as well as the rest of my comment are emasculating and/or effeminite in your eyes),
Ferris

This is a touching tribute, Luke Skywalker.

Especially the tribute to mass murderer and psychopathic loser Marc Lepine. Lovely. Everyone needs something to aspire to.

The issue of Marc Lepine is a complex issue. Much more complex than I would expect your lame brain to be able to understand. On one hand, yes, he was a mass murderer. But on the other, he was a man who was treated cruelly and unjustly by the feminazi state, and felt that he had no other option than to do what he did.

Oh, and this is in no way a “tribute” either to Lepine or to Masculist Man as you ignorantly suggest. As it says at the top of the page, this is a reference for information, and for men to have something to spur them on in the fight against feminism. But again, I realize that things such as reading comprehension and critical thinking are not your strong points.

Question: Does eMasculated Man put his hand on your head and say, in a deep voice: “Luke… I am your Father…”?

Answer: No.

Especially the tribute to mass murderer and psychopathic loser Marc Lepine. Lovely. Everyone needs something to aspire to.

Question: Does eMasculated Man put his hand on your head and say, in a deep voice: “Luke… I am your Father…”?

May the force be with you

Robin

Masc is too strong to be brainwashed by those camps, but still, what you said about sending him there is very repugnant, unless it was a joke.