Translation:”I would like you to overlook my lying ass on this one.”

You’re just another female apologist. We’ve heard it all before and if it isn’t coming from the cunts it’s coming from the manginas (wannabe cunts as far as I’m concerned) and we’re fucking sick of it. Now maybe some of us have posted things you can’t stomach but that is not our problem,now is it.

Oh and Simon, Khankrum, and other folks, it is possible to have honor without chivalry. Very possible. In fact the man who is in charge of the Honor Network himself wrote a great big long article about it. And there is scarcely a man who is more honorable than that man.

And in fact here is that article:
http://www.honornetwork.com/Foxes_Lions_Chivalry.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chivalry

That is an excellent analysis. I could not agree more.

Now Chivalry is a joke. Women in the 1970s abused Men who showed deference to Women. And insulted them as Sexists, Chauvinists and Misogynists. Some actually assulted Men who opened doors for Women or who showed them any kindness.

Hate bounces. And Feminists are now finding Men no longer want them even as Sex Partners. They are unfit to have sex with. Women are now in a quandry of how to fix this. Too late for them. Men are bailing on Feminized Women. In favor of more traditional, reasonable and realistic Women.

Men who still offer the old chivalry are dolts. Most Women do not deserve any respect from Men. They deserve our scorn and contempt. For their profound betrayal of our love and devotion.

Allow me to add: you’re a nutcase. I think you have serious issues. In fact, I think your issues HAVE issues. Your pathetic blog is a prime example of that. Ok, so you stand for the execution of women activists, execution of women politicians. You could also try to use proper spelling, by the way.

You carry grudges for some reason. Revel in them.

Let me see if I get this right: you want to promote men’s liberties by abolishing women’s rights? You’ve got issues, my friend. I thought that a healthy society is the one where gender differences are respected and both men and women have the same rights. You defend what exactly?

If the MRM relies on people as short-sighted as yourself, then let me tell you: we, men, are doooooomed. You hear me? Doomed!

Smart, sane, confident women don’t strive to destroy men’s rights. They’re too busy for that. Vice-versa works also. I don’t know in which world you’ve been living.

Last but not least: adapting to local culture is not being a mindslave, but being polite and respectful. If you can’t understand that, wherever you go outside the U.S. you’ll be regarded as an uneducated, toothless hillbilly. Suit yourself.

MindSlave.

Feminism is not a few decades old. Modern feminism started in 1850 at the senaca falls convention in the USA. Feminism itself has been around as long as women have existed. In the distant past it took the form of all-female cults and female herbalist covens where poisions were brewed and sold to wives of husbands.

Death To women’s Rights.
Viva Men’s Liberties.

However, the U.S. is the U.S., not the rest of the world. In some parts of the world, chivalry is regarded as a sign of a good upbringing, a sign of good manners, and some women appreciate that without feeling that men are putting themselves down by doing it. The way I was brought up, chivalry is a must, and I don’t feel any less of a man to open the door to let a girl or a woman pass. If I did that in the U.S. I would risk having an angry feminazi slapping the hell out of me. Some girls are not worth of chivalry.

Moreover, when I say Europe, I don’t mean Scandinavia. Women are cute up north, but they become raging rotweilers if you are chivalrous to them. All in all, it’s a matter of culture: behaving according to the local culture is always a good idea.

Chivalry is deference to women by men. Feminism is same thing, except it’s backed and enforced by the government. It may take different forms, but all in all it’s the exact same thing.

They’re all part of the matriarchy, and it is necessary for the matriarchy to be dismantled in order for there to be true freedom for us.

GL wants to talk about what’s “hardwired” into us, well that’s what’s “hardwired” into me deepest of all.

So when GL says to be chivalrous in order to get a young girl from Russia, I find that to be very detrimental to what we’re trying to accomplish here.

I swear when we’re through, I don’t care what there is in Russia, but there’s going to be no feminism and no chivalry here in the West. And that is the way that it should be.

No feminism.

And no chivalry.

You say that this blog is about “Traditional Values”. Isn’t chivalry a traditional value? Chivalry is about respecting the gender difference, and it makes feminists mad because of that.

You’ve been spending too much time in the U.S., buddy.