There have been numerous people who have written articles about abolishing the U.N. I agree, but the truth is that they are a bunch of Rats, and they themselves are not going to abolish themselves, so it will be up to a few brave individual nations to rectify this situation. And the first and most important of these nations is the United States.
There is absolutely no reason why the United States should be in the Rat Organization in the first place. They do nothing but take money from us in order to fund their ridiculous programs, and what is worse, they erode our sovereignty through their reckless internationalism. What needs to happen is that the United States needs to leave the Rat Organization.
And after the United States has left the Rat Organization I can almost guarantee you that the Rats will be so presumptuous to assume that their Rathouse will be allowed to remain in New York. This is not the case. The soil that that Rathouse is on is American soil, not Rat soil. Therefore the Rats will be required to airlift the Rathouse out of the country.
The President will make an Executive Order saying that the Rats have three months to airlift each and every brick of the Rathouse out of the United States, and if in three months the Rathouse is not gone, then the Rathouse will be demolished and the rubble hauled off to the dump at the Rats’ expense.
In either case, after the Rats have airlifted the Rathouse out of the United States, or after the Rathouse has been demolished and the rubble hauled off to the dump, any foreign Rats will be immediately taken to the nearest deportation center and deported to their respective countries. And they will never be allowed to enter the United States again as long as they live.
True that the U.N. is a bunch of parasites, but your “solution” is a bit ludicrous. If you insist on writing and behaving like an angst-ridden teenager, don’t be surprised if people don’t take you seriously.
Please note that I am a follower of this blog, and I have generally enjoyed it, but I think this post is of very low quality and all it does is diminish the good posts you’ve written before. You obviously have a lot to learn still.
I disagree. There’s nothing ludicrous about my solution.
They are not (for the most part) U.S. citizens. Their organization is not a U.S. organization. They are a foreign* organization that happens to be located on U.S. soil**. They have no inherent right to be here, they are guests in our house, and as such they are liable to being removed if we as a nation decide that they don’t deserve to be here.
The only thing that might be seen to be semi-extreme is the part about deporting the foreigners among them and never allowing them to return. But when you look closer at this, even this is not extreme. They are not U.S. citizens, they are involved with an organization which has been attempting to undermine the soverignty of the U.S., and causing trouble overall, and as such, they are liable — legally — to being deported and not being allowed to return.
——————————————————————-
*Ok, technically they are an internationalist organization rather than a strict foreign organization. But everything that would apply to a foreign organization as to how we can and cannot act toward them would logically apply to them in this case.
**Technically, some schmuck in the federal government “gave away the land” that they are on to them, so it is now supposedly owned by them instead of by the USA.
But this is actually a misconception. What the government did by giving that land away to them is actually unconstitutional. It says right in the constitution that the national government may not tamper with the land of any state. It may not cut a state into two states, it may not join two states together, and it may not give a state’s land away to another state or anyone else without the consent of that state. And I don’t remember New York ever consenting to that. That’s something that the federal government did on their own. So what the federal government did by giving New York’s land away is unconstitutional.
So therefore the agreement by which that land is now “U.N. land” rather than U.S. land is unconstitutional, and therefore null and void.
Luke,
It seems that the only thing you stand for is confrontation. In case you haven’t noticed, your radicalisms are only alienating the readers.
You sound like the merchantilists in Europe in the 18th century. I also hate the UN, but give me a break! Oh yeah, a bunch of parasitic bureaucrats of an organization that does nothing at all REALLY threaten the sovereignty of the mightiest nation on Earth.
Luke, get a girlfriend and be at peace with the world. Take that as a word of advice.
Peace
Rod, it really isn’t rocket science.
Just google U.N. threatens soverignty, and you’ll come up with dozens upon dozens of documented instances where they’ve been guilty of doing it.
I think you’re like most intelligent people, and in that, you see how the U.N has been purposely detrimental to the U.S., but you figure that the U.N. has been around for so long that you can’t imagine us ever getting the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S.
It’s a giant international organization, and thus a lot of people are cowed by it, but if the U.S. doesn’t take a stand, then what other country will?
Luke,
We do agree that the U.N. is full of evil-doers. I assume that we also do agree that there are many social parasites in this world, and that there are many things that are wrong and that should be changed.
What we don’t agree is how to address this issue. Your post is too effusive IMHO. I used to be like that, but what I have learned is that you just can’t charge up the hill against the bad guys in a frontal attack. You do that and you end up like Custer in Little Big Horn. The whole point I am trying to make is: don’t display your ideas so honestly, and try to be more polished and moderate. A brash general will lose the support of his troops, and an extravagant blogger will lose support of his readers, no matter how good his/her ideas are. It sucks, but marketing matters.
“don’t display your ideas so honestly,”
“and try to be more polished and moderate”
IE: Lie and make your words worthless.
“It sucks, but marketing matters.”
Not when you have no upkeep costs. WordPress is free.
“A brash general will lose the support of his troops,”
“an extravagant blogger will lose support of his readers,”
So, Rob, are you going to fight alongside Luke to the death?
No? Your support is worthless then.
Death To women’s Rights.
Viva Men’s Liberty
–MikeeUSA–
My family used to own the land that the UN building sits on today. It irks me every time I think about it.