Robin Steele Exposed — Part 1: Steele LIED About MRM Websites

Feminazi blogger Robin Steele has been flat out lying about the MRM for a long time now, and it’s high time that both she and her ridiculous claims are exposed. In her post, Angry Harry vs. Feministing Part 1, Steele gives fake reasons for the fake claim that that the MRM congragates in “cotentious little cliques”, “small forums”, “low-traffic blogs”, “insular” groups, and other such rubbish. (Here is her full quote):

DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR
The
MRM is currently made up of a contentious little cliques of injured men
who gather in small forums and low-traffic blogs and rant and rave to
each other about how their inadequacies are all due to their oppression
at the hands of a brutal Feminist regime. Their little
groups are so insular that after a while they begin to believe that the
world is somehow listening to their crackpot theories, and somehow
cares. The truth is that by any measure, AngryHarry.com is not even in
the same LEAGUE as Feministing.com. Here are a few traffic and ranking
comparisons:

[She then proceeds to give comparisons between Angry Harry and Feministing based on Alexa Rank, TrafficEstimate score, Google PageRank, Sites linking to each site, and "Estimated Resale Value of Blog" (via an estimation applet developed by Dane Carlson).]

And if that’s not enough, Robin comes up with this gem:

You’re comparing apples and pineapples and wondering why they do not look alike. It’s more like comparing apples to rocks. Anon.
post #3 makes an important (albeit unintentional) point. Women flock
together. They are much more likely to belong to groups, to cooperate.
Men are loners, individualistic. More than 10,000 women-only fitness
clubs like Curves have popped up in the US. Similar clubs for men
failed. Women work together. Men compete with each other.

Feministing is a cooperative with multiple women writers producing 10X the content of AH, who is one loner guy. Feministing allows comments and
participation, AH does not. Feministing puts in the effort to create a
professional image; AH rolls out of bed and puts on the rumpled shirt
from the pile after smelling the armpits. Sure, feministing trades
man-hating barbs and delights in seeing the pathetic MRA rally to back
AH in a meaningless poll, and then fail miserably. But the difference
is that when it comes time to rally to a cause, they will all act
together in unison. MRAs won’t (at least to the same degree). Apples. Rocks:
Look at bob’s comments here and elsewhere. He’s the old bitter guy who
sat in front of the tv for years growing a gut and an increasingly
know-it-all attitude and wondered why his wife started cheating on him.
Same as Masculist Man. Khankersore, others. They don’t want change,
they want to play victim, get the buzz off their rage rants, and
pretend their crackpot uninformed theories pass for knowledge and
principle. They will never create change, nor do they want to. They are
like a cancer to any men’s rights movement because they advocate war
between the sexes, which is not winnable.

In Maryland alone, three desperate fathers have murdered their beautiful children then
taken their own lives this year alone. Laws and procedures put in place
to legitimately protect abused women are now being used
non-legitimately as weapons by scorned and vindictive women (it has
nothing to do with feminism). What we need are husbands, wives, mothers
& fathers to start living by their Christian values of love &
respect, to learn to part amicably, to forgive, to stop seeking
revenge, to put their children’s welfare first.

The MRM cannot help correct this imbalance with women-bashing, chest-pounding,
isolation, unprofessionalism and by tolerating those in their midst who
just preach more hate, more violence. That the AH site is the best the
MRM has to compete with Feministing reveals why the MRM is, by
comparison, functionally impotent.

Bullshit. All of it. Especially the “insular groups”, et. al. part, and the assertion that Angry Harry is the best that we have to compete against the fembots with.

Actually trafficwise and Alexa-wise, Angry Harry is only the MRM’s 8th largest site. To imply that because the MRM’s 8th largest site is smaller than the feminists’ 1st largest site, the MRM congregates in “insular groups”, is “functionally impotent”, et. al., is obviously ludicrous. Yet that is exactly what Robin Steele is trying to sell here.

What would be an honest comparison to see the truth surrounding this matter would be between the feminists’ 1st largest site and the MRM’s 1st largest site. Did Robin do that? No. But let’s see what happens if we did do that. The feminists’ largest site on the internet is indeed feministing.com. The MRM’s largest site is called menarebetterthanwomen.com.

I’ve compiled a list of comparisons for these two sites based on Robin Steele’s criteria. The only thing I didn’t include was the blog value applet comparison, since I believe that applet to be so flawed such that it is essetially worthless, as it gives flawed zero values some of the time, and it’s quite nebulous what it was supposed to be measuring in the first place.

So without further ado, here are the comparisons (Note that these values were taken on Dec 6):

Alexa Ranking (smaller is better):

feministing.com—————-86,016—- menarebetterthanwomen.com–81,159

TrafficEstimate.com (number of visitors in the last 30 days): feministing.com————133,600—- menarebetterthanwomen.com–139,500

Number of Links (per Google): feministing.com—————-17,600—-menarebetterthanwomen.com–206

Google PageRank (larger is better): feministing.com———–6——–menarebetterthanwomen.com–0

Wait, what’s this?! The biggest MRA site on the internet outranks the biggest feminist site on the internet in Alexa rank, and had a higher number of visitors in the last 30 days?

Admittedly, even two years ago this would have been totally unheard of. But this is precisely what has happened now. The biggest internet site for our movement which has almost zero money now outranks the biggest internet site for its opponent (feminism) which has tons of government and private money. And not only that, throughout most of 2006, menarebetterthanwomen.com as the biggest MRA site outranked feministing.com as the biggest feminist site as well.

So it looks like all this feminist fiction spread by Robin Steele and others about the MRM not being able to spread its message through websites and compete with the feminists was a load of you-know-what.

Now there is the fact that feministing.com has a higher number of links to it and a higher Google PageRank than menarebetterthanwomen.com, but in the final calculation, that really doesn’t matter. If X number of people come through 100 links to get to a site, than the result is the same if X number of people come through 10,000 links to get to a site. Or maybe they’re coming through by search engine. It doesn’t matter. If they’re seeing the message, then they’re seeing the message. Ditto goes for Google PageRank.

If we have a good Alexa rank, which is based off of hits and number of pages visited within the site, and a good number of hits overall, that’s all we need. The only other really meaningful thing to check would be Alexa Reach value, which is basically the percentage of internet users reached by the site. And we’re doing great in that department as well. Way better than we did in 2006, too.

Anyway, I also took the initiative to compare the top 10 feminist sites with the top 10 MRA sites in Alexa rank, TrafficEstimate.com score, and number of links according to Google. (I didn’t bother with Google PageRank because it’s based mainly off of links, and it really doesn’t give that much information outside of number of links, and how the site pertains to Google, and I didn’t bother with the value-of-blog applet for reasons I described above.)

And let me tell you, the results of this comparison amazed us and showed us so-called “deluded ones” that we were competing had spread our message to a degree that none of us had anticipated so soon, and that we were in way better competition with the feminists than any of us had henceforth thought.

Feminist vs. MRA site comparison

Dec 6, 2007 (A Preliminary Analysis)

Alexa Rankings (smaller is better):

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com—————-86,016—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–81,159

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-154,376—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–179,200

3. now.org————————-218,202—3. savethemales.ca—————–305,205

4. feministe.us—————–233,894—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–338,633

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—240,110—5. glennsacks.com—-390,983

6. amptoons.com——————–267,609—6. nomarriage.com————-441,478

7. feminist.com———————346,068—7. americanwomensuck.com—–600,019

8. feminist.org———————-372,675—8. angryharry.com—————-688,990

9. msmagazine.com—————–400,945—9. the-niceguy.com—————755,047

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—564,218—10. antimisandry.com————-1,254,137

TrafficEstimate.com (Estimated Number of Visits in the last 30 days):

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com————133,600—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–139,500

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-85,800—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–76,400

3. now.org————————-65,300—3. savethemales.ca—————–49,400

4. feministe.us—————–61,700—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–45,000

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—89,458,000*–5. glennsacks.com–39,400

6. amptoons.com——————–55,200—6. nomarriage.com————-35,000

7. feminist.com———————44,100—7. americanwomensuck.com—–24,800

8. feminist.org———————-41,200—8. angryharry.com—————-20,500

9. msmagazine.com—————–38,500—9. the-niceguy.com—————17,700

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—26,700—10. antimisandry.com————-N/A

*I find this reading to be doubtful, because google.com got a score of 332,068,000, and if this reading is correct, it would mean that this site got over a quarter as much traffic as Google did over the same period, which I find doubtful given both common sense and their Alexa rating.

**I’m very happy, but not surprised, at how well GL at russianwomen.wordpress.com has done. We have spoken many times and I know him well, at least over the internet. His cunning operation of his site and savvy demeanor and writing style have catapulted him into one of the top positions trafficwise in the MRM — giving us another badly needed high traffic site with which to compete against the feminists in the information war.

Links according to Google

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com—————-17,600—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–206

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-27,100—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–1,170

3. now.org————————-3,480—3. savethemales.ca—————–566

4. feministe.us—————–770—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–171

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—N/A–5. glennsacks.com–377

6. amptoons.com——————–93—6. nomarriage.com————-325

7. feminist.com———————1,320—7. americanwomensuck.com—–240

8. feminist.org———————-2,800—8. angryharry.com—————-318

9. msmagazine.com—————–759—9. the-niceguy.com—————-16

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—3,170—10. antimisandry.com————-121

I believe one question here remains. If Harry was only the 8th largest site, why did we nominate him? Why didn’t we nominate our biggest site, Menarebetterthanwomen.com? It’s because the majority of us thought that even though he didn’t have the biggest site, out of the bigger sites, his version of the MRA message was the best and most well-written. And we had everything prepared to launch him to victory. Everything. That is, until the polls were rigged. Do we have proof of this? Yes we do, and Lee Raconteur sums it up quite nicely:

“AH had 540 votes when vote displays went secret, FS had 420. You mean to tell me that AH LOST 94 votes and FS gained 299 in one month? That NOT ONE SINGLE ADDITIONAL VOTE was cast for AH in weeks? I’m sorry, you have no credibility. This ‘Award’ was clearly fixed. I simply don’t trust you or the results” -Lee Racounteur

Next time, in Part II, I’ll have an even more damning expose’ of Robin Steele — proof that she is a female supremacist bent on female domination, male subservience, and more.