I have recently received a message from Drex, a high level MRA, that the term “sex tourist” was actually brought into being by our enemies the Feminazis and their collaborationists and is being used by them to demonize men who take another alternative besides putting up with men’s
Here is the Original Messege from Drex:
Sex tourists..
What a pile of shite invented by the feminazi’s..
I guess its ok for a load of clapped out bags of celulllite to go doing the “shirley valentine” but when its men looking for a piece of fur, then suddenly its all wrong..
The western feminazi skanks dont like the idea that they cant corner the market, they try their restrictions as best they can in their own Cuntries, but men have this inventive way of looking elsewhere, so the bitter hags try and stop it by shaming and even legislation..
A gent popping out of his town to see what teh beaver rating is next door is as much a “sex tourist” as someone popping abroad for a broad..
But, no, the femiskanks and mangina mafia want to limit a mans dick to begging for what is not even worth sliding a dogs in..
The whole power of feminists is based on limiting a gents sexual opportunities as much as possible..
But, its come to the point now that many blokes would rather crack one off over porn..
Or just flea the Cuntry to scratch that itch..
What an excellent and astute observation he has made. It’s now clear to me that the term “sex tourist” and “sex tour” are nothing but feminazi shaming language, and thus ought no longer to be used by anyone.
The term “sex tourist” will now be added to the list of known anti-MRA and anti-male slurs and hate terms, located in the Masculist Encyclopedia.
Also, because Drex has discovered that the term “sex tourist”, and by extension the term “sex tour”, are feminazi shaming language, and it is MRM policy that MRA’s may not use feminazi shaming language, all MRA’s are compelled to no longer use these terms in MRA writings.
(I myself am going to go one step further, and when I have the time, I am going to go through this blog and change all the instances where I have used these terms.)
Hey, how are we the “Eastern Girls” supposed to call the guys who tour here for “sex without obligations”, in contrast to marriage-minded travelers? Outside your jurisdiction, let us use the words that have logically emerged and been in use in our own local context.
sure, change the term.
it won’t erase the SHAME you losers feel when you travel to another country because you cannot get tail over here!!!
laughable.
Alsi, no MRA in his right mind would want to put up with a naggy, bitch like you just to get “tail”. So of course we’re leaving the situation for a better one.
Just like Drex said, feminazi bitches like you aren’t worth sticking a fucking dog’s into.
Natalia, I think you misunderstood the scope of my post.
I was talking to the MRM when I wrote this post, Natalia.
You can call it whatever you want, I can’t stop you, but here in the MRM, there are certain standards for which language we do and don’t use.
And when we find out that a word demonizes men, then we don’t use that word anymore.
Natalia, you have absolutely no idea of the demons that we Western men are forced to face.
I’ve been accused practically of being a monster by all these “Russian women people”, but I haven’t done one thing that wasn’t in the best interest of my brothers in the MRM.
So I’m telling you to sit back and let the MRM handle how we want to do things. You handle how you want to do things, and we will handle how we want to do things.. Ok?
Alsi just what planet have you been living on? Here in the USA Sex Prison for Men. We have just finished a 13 month legal action against Three Duke LaCrosse players. Who were accused of Gang Raping a Woman. That she changed her story 12 times did not matter. That she had DNA from 4 Different Men, none of the Duke LaCrosse players did not matter. That she tried the same thing against Three Black Men 10 years earlier did not matter. That ATM Records, Taxi Ride, Credit Card receipts signed showed they were elsewhere at the time the crime was alleged to occur did not matter.
Any time a Man in the US engages with Sex with an American Woman he is at risk of Jail. Marital Rape Laws do not even exempt Husbands having Sex with their Wives. Men are presumed Guilty and must prove they are innocent. If she Lies, proves she has lied, nothing happens to her. NOTHING.
In Family Courts in a Divorce Men have no rights. Judges do not care about Men’s Rights or Fairness at all. The system is so lob sided that US Men are preempting being accused falsely. And have concluded that US Women are unfit to Marry and have children with. Last year 12 of US Men married Foreign Women. And another 22% declared they will never marry. Feminism is freeing Men from US Women and Marriage.
Feminists declared in the 1960s that Marriage was oppressive of Women. And they intended to Abolish it. Seems they may actually get their way. American Women may watch as US Men either Leave with a Foreign Wife, or bring her home to the US.
As friend of mine told me, getting a hooker is cheaper, financially and emotionally, because you don´t have to deal with crap from immature women just to get laid,that could lead you to financial and emotional bankrupt, so my friend, my advice is: Follow your own way, do what you gotta do, everything else is irrelevant.Don´t give a damn about what others say or think, follow your path.
(Sigh)
(Attempt to work with idiots…)
Have you ever actually –been– to a whore, Simon?
Luke?
Feel good afterwards?
Or even anonynomous one nighters?
Any takers?
Who are you to tell other people how to live their lives?
If a man uses a hooker then that is his problem and nobody else.
When I was younger, I had a few “one-night-stands”, but always been responsible, and , yes I felt very good, because I hadn´t to deal with her whining just to get laid, it served my purpose, empty my b@ll$.
Screw what others say or think, I follow my path.
Simon, I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Luke, you’re still young, you have lots of time (doesn’t that…make your blood boil). To my point.
While Drex is right that feminists hypocritically use the term to demonize men, what’s wrong with calling a spade a spade? Is calling a feminist “bitch” less demonizing and the mark of a gentleman worthy of a Real Woman, even if it is “calling a cat a cat”? If we can’t be so noble in a blog, how much less in regular life?
Natalia asks a fair question, and you haven’t even offered to research an alternative to a term which “ought no longer to be used by anyone” including herself presumably. I’m sure she’s patient enough to forgive this youthful passionate oversight (if we weren’t passionate about our cause we wouldn’t be here) but let’s not take her for granted.
I know about demons too…it’s all too easy to react this way, or perhaps go off on some misogynistic rant as I have in the past, when it’s what we’re used to receiving.
I note three main reasons why a woman will react negatively to a man: she’s projecting a bad experience onto him, he’s being a dumbass, or she’s on a power trip (ref River Boat Captain on solution). The first two go hand-in-hand. If he’s not being a dumbass, she’ll stop projecting.
Reading posts by some guys on here and on GL’s related blog, the critique “little boys with hurt egos” seems a fair one at times.
Remember how I “owned that feminazi bigtime”? What did I do? I agreed with what she said, reinterpreted it to my advantage to show her I was better than that, and confronted her pettiness. Simply put, I wasn’t being a dumbass. MUCH harder offline for sure. I, too have a long way to go on making these responses reactive and behaving in a calm, mature MANner.
All for now…
Uh……no, sorry, I have to disagree there. Let me give you a little backstory…
That “little boys with hurt egos” comment was made by a megalomaniac going under the name ‘Rexpat’ (he also went under the name ‘Canuck’ at the beginning). He believed in outlandish, fantastical conspiracy theories about “Freemasons” and “The Illuminati”, from which he thought that the world could only be saved by him, and others like him, by marrying (and having children with) Russian women, which according to him only he and others like him are worthy of.
He was a bad influence on GL, a horrible influence. He, his lackeys, and people like him influenced GL in a very negative way, and now GL’s blog is centered around providing an instruction manual to men as to how they can jump through Russian women’s hoops rather than what it used to be, which was a resource to empower men, and to let them know about a country which is not gynocentric, and about women who will treat them like a man ought to be treated.
Anyway, Rexpat and his lackeys got mad because some of the other posters on my blog and I said essentially that we’d rather pay for prostitutes than jump through all those stupid hoops, and also that we wanted to live free lives that didn’t involve jumping through women’s hoops. When Rexpat and his lackeys couldn’t come up with a reason for why we should bother with jumping through hoops rather than living our own lives and going our own way, they resorted to several shaming and name calling tirades to try to shame us into compliance and in order to turn GL and others against us. They succeeded in getting a couple other people to join in in bashing us, but they couldn’t get GL to join in in bashing us, so they got mad about that, too.
So there really is no merit to that “little boys with hurt egos” comment. It’s just a piece of leftover crud from Rexpat’s megalomania and anti-MGTOW tirades.
“Reading posts by some guys on here and on GL’s related blog, the critique “little boys with hurt egos” seems a fair one at times.” (Андрей in SK)
I don’t see this applying to any posters on GL’s blog.
Not even Luke, despite my disagreements with him. And certainly not myself or any of the others. Legitimate issues are raised there.
Sorry socon. I meant no disrespect, particularly to GL and you. And I don’t recall exactly where I saw that line, bibliographies are my weakness.
I simply find cheap namecalling like bitch, mangina, emasculated man etc. and advocating treating women like a warm blow-up doll to be crude and childish regardless of the circumstances. I’d like to believe thinking Men could be credited as better than that and not give Feminists like alsi more ammo to denigrate us with. Do we really want to give even the IMPRESSION that her statement has ANY credibility by acting this way?
I’m advocating we take a little more care with our words. Especially since we have time to think about them in blog forums.
Like I said, it’s not easy and I’m working on this myself. I’ve seen the line between Woman and Feminist blur as I’ve gone on a reactionary misogynistic rant offline. Or perhaps I should have continued to hold my tongue rather than push my sister-in-law’s button with “calling you a Jezebel would be an insult to that late Queen”. She seemed like such a fine woman when they first met, it’s really sad.
Anyway, enough rambling…I’m still happy to see everyone on blogs like these, even Mikee. I totally understand where he’s coming from and at first blush, even at a Men’s Rights extreme, seems pretty tame compared the Feminist misandry I’ve browsed. I disagree with the tactics though; random violence only serves to harden our opposition’s resolve and make martyrs like with abortion doctors or the recent members of Canada’s Largest Street Gang [as the RCMP t-shirt proclaims].
Yep, the feminazi have always opposed whoring even when they wanted sexual liberation of females. What they object to is the ability of men to hire females for sex. Feminazi believe that females should own and control men. They believe that men should have to grovel before them to get laid, and be at their beck and all. Feminist claims to support sexual liberation mean that a female can get laid by whichever man she chooses whenever she chooses, but he shall have no power over sex or reproduction. All that power is to be given to females under feminist dogma.
All forms of whoring were made illegal by first wave feminism, and men are criminals for hiring a whore. But men got around feminists by going to other countries where their feminist domination has not yet prevented females from working in sex trades. Western femiNazi make “sex tourism” illegal to control and dominate men, even if it takes high paying jobs away from other females. It’s about female control and domination.
Khank said, “Feminists declared in the 1960s that Marriage was oppressive of Women. And they intended to Abolish it.”
Yes, it was adopted as the goal of feminism, but you have the year wrong. You have the century wrong. Many younger men assume that feminist goals are what has happened in the past 40 years or so. That is very wrong.
The goal of destroying marriage along with “marriage oppresses women” was adopted at the Seneca Falls Conference in 1848.
During the first century after the feminists aborted those goals they enacted alimony and “no fault” divorce. Both of which were in place before the 1960s in most of the US.
When we MEN start working to oppose feminism we need to learn to know our enemy, to understand how far reaching and deep their tentacles have gone.
Bob
What an excellent post Bob. You rock.
Bob knows his shit!! From age of consent laws, to rape laws, you wont find anything more striaghtforward and frank than bobs blog..
The feminists keep their power by doing their best to limit men getting want they want..
Its got so bad that, hey, we dont want it anyway now!!
Its too rotten to be worth it!
Thats why they would rather go where, presumably, they get less stress and a better quality of woman.
Feminists intend to control Men’s Sexuality. They are ignoring the Boomer women going to Kenya for Sex Tourism romps. And the Cougar Movement of Older Women screwing younger Men. For fun and pleasure. It is time to call them on their lies and nonsense.
Bob,
I do not dispute that the Seneca Falls Convention was where this idea was first presented a floated to Women in the US. I am referencing a Time Frame of Modern Feminists who reintroduced the same concept to a Modern Audience.
We are seeing the conflict out in the open with Mommy Wars. Where Married Women who are educated and give up their Careers to be stay at home Moms. Are attacked as sell outs. Linda Hirshmann is one of the Feminists involved in this rubbish.
Thanks for the details Bob. I appreciate the accuracy and insights you bring to the conversation.
Been there done that. My life has been stolen from me by one of these feminazi witches of Satan. Big warning from myself to any man thinking of marrying one of these babylonian snakes. DON”T DO IT! There is absolutely nothing for a man in marriage in the US and many other democratic nations. If I had my way, feminazi witch burning would be legal and a worldwide spectator sport.
Women object to men not paying enough for sex. Or more accurately paying a woman to leave. Whores offer sex at a bargain price. This pisses off women who want men to pay more. Really all women are whores. All this bitching about bargain whoring is just the fear of competition and price deflation. If a commodity like sex was more available price would fall, very bad news for women who have price artificially high.
It cracks me up that “Drex” could be so offended by the words “sex tourist” when he (on other websites) frequently calls women cunts, skanks, whores, and more…how funny it is that he demands more respectful words be used to describe men. Definitely a double standard.