I put up a new post discussing it.

Fellas, these toxic harpies are ruthless and morally bankrupt.

Say what you will about MRAs, but most of us at least still stand for Constitutional rights like free speech and freely engage in open discourse. Whereas feminists protect their web of lies behind heavily-censored “safe spaces” and Stalinesque silencing tactics. These dirty cvnts aren’t just frothing misandrists…but also highly-unethical anti-Constitutionalists.

If the person responsible for this misandry were to apologize and retify the situation then we can move on,right?

Liberal ‘rocker’ doesn’t like your (or my) weblogs.

It’s no sooner that MRA’s hit those feminist bloggers with a denial of service attack that wiped out 3 of their blogs/boards that a database corruption at Antimisandry wiped out 6 of ours, and now yours is gone.

So that’s 7 of our blogs gone, but I guess I have to admit that Zarmband is back with all his stuff, so that’s +1, so that’s 6 of ours gone with 3 of theirs gone.

That’s one step forward with 2 steps back.

I have a response — a big one, it’s just that it’s taking me awhile to write since I’ve been so busy.

women’s rights activists have gotten my email address deleted, my weblog at http://mikeeusa.blogspot.com blocked (if you’re not an author your told that this blog has violated TOS and is only visible to authors), and have reported me to the police and the FBI.

I’ve put a writeup of this on another weblog of mine at http://mikeesjournal.blogspot.com/

Here’s the women being triumphant:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=229×8069#8134

I guess next is for me to be arrested and imprisoned. Oh well, that’s what we get for being milktoast men and not overthrowing the gynoarchy.

–MikeeUSA–

“This blog is in violation of Blogger’s Terms of Service and is open to authors only”

Death To women’s Rights.
Viva Men’s Liberties.
–MikeeUSA–

Sometimes, people (of either gender) just have “something” about their behaviour that makes you shudder – a sort of coldness usually. That is what people describe, rightly or wrongly, as creepiness.

Last but not least, the man of indeterminate age who used to hang around the door of my flat at the sort of time I got home from work, attempting to bar my entry and making weird comments to me, despite the fact that he’d been told to F off on a couple of occasions – he was creepy. I bet you’re going to try and defend him now; I’m all ears.

I think those voices should be heard, so I’m going to post them here as well:

[Drex:]
aye.. well, its a common ploy of women.. i usually note that women often refer to men as “perverts”.. which I find pretty offensive since more women than men seem to see fit to display their flesh to the world first and ask questions later..

[Annette:]

Originally Posted by Drex
aye.. well, its a common ploy of women.. i usually note that women often refer to men as “perverts”.. which I find pretty offensive since more women than men seem to see fit to display their flesh to the world first and ask questions later..

My mother used to refer to my late father as a “pervert”. I found out why she called him that. Because he liked sex.

HAHA!!! I guess that makes me a pervert too?

[Drex:]

Oddly, it seems to be a phrase that is never applied to women..

Like, “peeping tom”, “flasher”, etc..

A woman sunbathing naked or standing at her window in the raw is not a flasher, she is a victim of “peeping toms”..

Reverse the genders and the man is a flasher!

Another interesting one is the way that men get the labels in the age discrimination game..

An older man snaking a young woman is a “dirty old man”..

An younger man slipping an older woman is a “toy boy”..

Mind you, there is not really any male equivalent of a “slag”..

So I guess its swings and roundabouts!!

I have noticed a recent phenonema whereby it is now socially acceptable for women to proclaim their love of masturbation and boast of their dildo collections..

What they fail to realise, is that it does not really send the same messages out to men that it does to their female chums..

The most appalling thing I see is that old women of “Gilf” standard are loudly proclaiming their prefference for the youngest of men..

This is a tragic waste of young mens lives I feel!

And it demonstrates just how hopeless many young men are that the only way they can get by in life is by being accessories to spent women..

Speaking logically and naturally, it is far more “perverse” for a man to get wood over a 60 year old than it is for him to get a stiffy over a shapely 15 year old schoolgirl..

But, you wont be seeing that defined by the feminists as sick!!

[Annette:]
I see it as creepy when older women (40s, 50s) go after young guys. Smacks of pedophilia to me, even if the young guy is in his 20s or 30s.

However, I never saw anything wrong with men in their 40s and 50s preferring girls in their 20s. That always seemed natural to me.

Please don’t bash me for being hypocritical, I don’t know why I have always seen it like this, but I have! To me, its normal and natural for the male to be the older one, even if he is older by 20 years.

[Marx:] Nature seems to follow your ideals, Annette.

Okay, I stand corrected on the hate speech definition. I checked it up. I was thinking of the definitionof illegal hate speech (violence, etc.) which is pretty mich the same here as in the US.

I maintain that saying that using the word “creep” amounts to hate speech is one hell of a stretch of the imagination, no matter how broad a definition you use.

“As for you, you’ve already shown your cards, socon, and I really don’t think too many MRA bloggers or sitemasters are going to be linking to you.”

Oh no. I guess I’ll just have to hang out there alone with my SNOB friends. LOL.

And btw, I noticed that at least half the prominent MRA bloggers either hate MascoNazi Man, or are hated by him, or just ignore him. Some leader you chose. ROFL.

Socon, it is hate speech / a slur because in our feminist society, in 99.99% of the times that it is used in its derogatory context, it is used by women against men, or by men with feminist leanings against other men. It is virtually NEVER used against women, even when they do things that might (hypothetically) be deserving of that label.
In other words Socon, it is hate speech because of its (prominent)de facto role in targeting and degrading men in our society, and its de facto role in enforcing a sexist double standard such as TheFabulousMs.Pitt mentioned in Comment #7.

And it’s not okay for people such as GL, who are trusted to uphold antifeminism, to put their seal of approval on it by throwing it around. It’s almost as if you and GL don’t realize that it’s offensive to men, and that it degrades men.

“Rachel, what you just said is almost like me saying it’s okay to refer to a gay person as “queer”

Personally, I prefer the term faggot.

*Sigh* It wasn’t a good example. But it’s the only one I could think of that illustrated exactly what I wanted to say: that is somebody using a slur, and then hiding behind the dictionary definition of the slur to “legitimize” it. I meant to use it to say that it’s not acceptable to degrade a man with the label “creepy” and then hide behind the dictionary definition of the word “creepy” when you know in your heart that you used it as a slur against that man, which has nothing to do with the dictionary definition.

That’s all I meant to do with that example. I didn’t intend it to formulate a pro or anti gay stance through it. I just used it to make a point.

Personally, I prefer the term faggot.

I maintain that saying that using the word “creep” amounts to hate speech is one hell of a stretch of the imagination, no matter how broad a definition you use.

“As for you, you’ve already shown your cards, socon, and I really don’t think too many MRA bloggers or sitemasters are going to be linking to you.”

Oh no. I guess I’ll just have to hang out there alone with my SNOB friends. LOL.

And btw, I noticed that at least half the prominent MRA bloggers either hate MascoNazi Man, or are hated by him, or just ignore him. Some leader you chose. ROFL.

Rachel, of course it’s different if you’re referring to “a creepy bug” or something like that.

But every time I’ve ever heard the word “creepy” used toward a man, it’s been used to stigmatize and degrade that man, to imply that he is some sort of pervert.

And I’ve virtually never heard it used toward women, no matter what they do.

It’s an anti-male slur that is promoted by the feminist society we live in that hates men, and wants to degrade men in any way it can.

socon

Luke, I may be wrong, but as far as I know, the generally accepted defintion of “hate speech” is speech which explicitly advocates physical violence against an individual, group of individuals, or other entities.

Well I’m here to tell you that in fact you are wrong, socon, because hate speech also includes racially-charged slurs and gender-charged slurs intended to demean people of a specific race or gender. Here in the United States hate speech is not illegal (unless it involves physical threats, etc.), but it’s still hate speech, nonetheless.

Feminists and antifeminists throw hate speech at each other all the time. That’s nothing new, that’s supposed to be expected. This is because both sides hate the other, and have no respect for the other.

But GL and other people who are supposed to be on the antifeminist side ought not to utter hate speech against men, because it betrays the respect that men have for them as antifeminists.

As for you, you’ve already shown your cards, socon, and I really don’t think too many MRA bloggers or sitemasters are going to be linking to you.

But as for GL, there are people in the MRM who trust GL and who link to GL, and when GL turns around and starts throwing around these labels that promote misandry, that’s a real betrayal of the antifeminists and MRA’s who trust him.

Again, I have no problem with him putting men who try to get the girls to contact them for a relationship on his spam list. What they are doing is indeed a form of spam.

What I have a problem with is the word that he used. Because it’s a word which is used to stigmatize men and demonize men and promote misandry.

I’m absolutely no fan of political correctness, but I hope that some day in the future, society looks upon the word “creepy” as they look upon the n-word today. I hope that they look at it as a relic of the past from a time when society was bigoted against men, and misandry was rampant. And they will thus regard it as an inappropriate term not to be used.

PS: The women’s rights activists have gotten my yahoo email address shut down (mikeeusaa@yahoo.com) (they got it off my blog probably).

–MikeeUSA–

Needless to say, we won’t be helping you again.

When I took offence to the youtuber RV bashing men and saying women were more compassionate, Luke didn’t have any problem with this one. Instead of siding with a masculist, he sided with a non masculist. Hmmmmm, it does sound hypocritical to me.

And get this, because he sucks masculist mans cock (he does it again in this post) the socalled masculist doesn’t have a problem with Luke’s unhelpfullness over at youtube and the way he didn’t side with a masculist. I think someone’s a little biased, don’t you masculist man? You should look at the facts before you let your cocksucker influence your decisions.

And don’t expect any sympathy from me on this one Luke, as you are a hypocrit. And when you said in the other thread about not ”helping” me anymore, well, GOOD. I don’t want or need your so called ”help”, because your brand of ”help” is worthless. You are a letdown, not a help. Your also a lovesick cocksucker for masculist man but thats another story for another day.

This time it really is good bye and good riddance, but if I hear of you being a whining hypocrit again I’ll be sure to tell you about it.

Greg.

Now unlike “creepy”, which is an ill-defined term which really only exists as hate-speech, “pervert” is legitimate in extreme cases, such as to describe a child molesterer, or something of that nature.

BUT in practice, in 99.9% of cases where the word “pervert” is used against men, it is totally illegitimate and unwarranted hate speech.

And also, where it might legitimately be used to describe a female child molesterer or other female offender of that nature, it is often neglected to be used.