Yesterday, I overheard two women (college students) talking about how they were going to trick men into thinking that they were going to have sex with them, and then kick the men in the testicles and then take out a pen and stab them. And then they said that they were going to cry rape, and to explain the stabbing, they were going to say “Oh, I was so helpless I was flailing my arms around and I didn’t know I was going to stab him”. And then the other one suggested stabbing the men in the eye with the pen, and saying “Oh I was so helpless I was flailing my arms around and I didn’t know I was going to stab him in the eye.” And then they both laughed about it. I was totally disgusted. But of course this is typical because I also overheard these women talking about the feminist “self-defense” program that they were in, so that’s probably where they got it from.
And before even that, my first week back at school, I overheard two women bragging about all the special privileges that feminism got them, while still getting men to be chivalrous to them. And they were laughing about that too. I was sickened.
(Note: I might expand on this post later if I remember more details about these incidents.)
I’ve added a link to your site
.
It’s common for females to be taught to stab a man in the eye with her keys if she feels threatened by him. She will then, ofcourse have her feminist police state destroy him further (the loss of an eye + jail + loss of earning ability).
The proper reaction to an assult on a Man’s person by a female is this:
* Realise your life is over weather you do anything further or not, the female and her government servants will crush you in a short while.
* Decide that your life will not be the only life that ends today.
* Kill the woman+.
* and her friend if you have a quick means of killing.
* Kill the police if they have allready arrived++.
* Find the nearest women’s shelter, women’s rights organization office, etc and continue the revenge untill what was going to happen anyway does happen. If you can reach a 1 to 10 kill ratio you have done well.
+ 3 min chokehold will suffice for those who don’t know/have other means (kneck breaking, knifing, etc).
++Often they wear bullet resistant vests, but these usually don’t protect the top of the arms/underarms : if you cut here you will hit a major artery and bleed your adversary out, same can be done with the inner thighs but a croch protector may get in the way. Sometimes police have kneck protectors too. If all else fails try to stab through the vest, this sometimes works if you have a sturdy knife.
SHIT!!! I sincerely hope you have reported them.
Check this out:
http://mailman.linuxchix.org/mailman/listinfo/grrls-only
This angers me. LinuxChix is a pro-women’s rights, pro-lesbian group that I wish very much would be destroyed. Females contribute very very little to Free/OpenSource software yet they have edged their feminist organisations into the linux world (Also see Debian women : http://lists.debain.org/debian-women )
Is there any way we could hurt them? Does anyone have relatives/friends in law enforcement investigative services? Could they be sic’d on these organizations and these women? (Since we won’t do anything against them ourselves).
Your opinion?
Marx, I will.
You could bring charges of terroristic threats against them. And you should. Keep us posted. This is important.
I like you MikeeUSA but God I hope you don’t get me in any trouble.
Mike, if all goes well I’m going to be free from this feminist state one day. And then I’ll return to retake the West one day.
But Mike, buddy, I really wasn’t quite expecting you to say stuff about killing women on here. Mike, I thought you were going to say stuff about the thousand year matriarchy and your other stuff about that.
Because Mike, I’ve kinda gotta graduate from college here, and that kinda involves not getting kicked out. The college administration already knows about this blog, and they already aren’t happy with me about it, and they’ll fry me if they see stuff on here about killing people.
So next time you comment, I want you to talk about the thousand year matriarchy and stuff like that, and leave the killing part out.
I mean, I and the other readers already know you believe in that sort of stuff, but you’ve got to leave it out for my safety because they’ll come after me for the stuff that you say, and that’s not fair to me.
It’s nothing against you, really, but please, follow what I said.
Luke, I could do with some help from you and any other the other mra’s. I dont post much, but I challenged a white supremist over at youtube, not about race but on gender, and he and a bunch of his buddies went on the attack on me. I responded in turn, but need some help.
Here’s the link,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2F4SlzsqcI&mode=related&search=
Greg
Here’s that link again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2F4SlzsqcI
I’ll be on the job as soon as I am able.
Mikee, I just saw your post # 3. That’s the stuff I’m talking about.
Inciting the breakup of feminist man hating organizations is a very good tactic.
Are the two organizations that you listed feminist? I’m just wondering do you have any examples of them endorsing feminism?
I just want to see what we’re dealing with.
By the way Luke, I have been debating over there and have fought the corner of men to my best ability. I will keep doing this, plus there is a response vid I am have also debated through this link. You should come check these manginas and feminiskanks out.
Greg.
Greg: Supremacists tend to be pro-feminism, that goes way back. In the past all that was needed was for a white woman to accuse a non-white Man of rape and he was tortured and then hanged (a picanic). Today all Men are suseptable to such accusations: It’s just an expantion of the hate that black Men etc got to all Men.
Luke: Here is an example from one of the admins on their mailing list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2007/08/msg00001.html
http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/FrontPage/quotes
It’s been 24 hours and still Luke you have not come over to assist in debating with a masculist brother. You yourself were glorifying the unity of the MRM yet you have not stepped up. If you continue ignoring the requests of a masculist brother then you are nothing but hot air.
I will continue defending the male gender and wiping the floor with critics of male rights.
Greg.
Greg, the reason why I didn’t respond immediately is that I didn’t understand what the argument was all about.
Your opponent is anti-abortion, acknowledges the existence of sexist laws, believes that stereotypically men act on logic whereas women act on emotion, etc…
At first look, you seem to have gotten caught up in nitty gritty details that I personally would have not bothered with.
Then there’s the fact that your opponent seems to be coming across a lot clearer than you are, and is actually not in disagreement with many of your points.
Yet I’ll give it a second look, but right now I have to go somewhere because I have something I have to do.
But after I get back, I will give it a second look.
Luke, you didn’t watch the video properly, as is clear from your response. If you had watched his earlier video which I was responding to, you will see he said women were more compassionate than men and I disagreed. The guy is also a racist and supports the abortions of non whites. You were meant to support a masculist brother yet you are defending someone who is not even a self identified masculist as I am. You Luke, are a non-mra and a fraud, so stick that up your pipe and smoke it.
I won’t be coming here again.
Greg.
Greg, I DID watch the video properly. I watched it at least 5 times.
You wanted me to watch an earlier video? Well why didn’t you say so??
BTW Greg, there was a feminist on the comment section of the video that I DID watch, and I argued against that feminist. That’s gotta count for something.
I disagree with RV’s white supremicist views, but as for the rest of his views, he is anti-abortion, he believes that women think with emotion whereas men think with logic, and he acknowledges the existence of sexist laws against men.
And he was very clear about it. Very clear.
He supports the abortions of non-whites? Really? I didn’t see that in his video. He seemed to say that he was against all abortion. Maybe that was in another one of his videos, I don’t know, but you should have told me before, and you should have made yourself clearer.
And as for him being a white supremicist, you weren’t clear before that this is the aspect of him that you wanted me to argue against.
If you would have came to me and said: “This guy is a white supremicist, come argue against his white supremisict beliefs,” then that would have sent a clear message as to what I was supposed to do.
Instead, I got no clear message as to what exactly I was supposed to do.
I am only responding because I will not let this rest until I counterattack your hostile messages. Here’s what I told you at the start:
“I dont post much, but I challenged a white supremist over at youtube, not about race but on gender, and he and a bunch of his buddies went on the attack on me.” (Plus link).
So buckeroo, you could have looked at that link, took my words into account, and then saw his followers and some of his other vids as well as the one I linked to. He fessed up to saying women were more compassionate than men and also admitted that he didn’t think the gender issue is as important as the race one.
You siding with him in your first response in this comments section of your blog says to me you don’t think before you speak, and that you are quick to side with others before a fellow masculist brother. Here’s what you said if you need clarification:
“At first look, you seem to have gotten caught up in nitty gritty details that I personally would have not bothered with.”
Well a true masculist or mra would have found a problem with some guy saying how compassionate and great women are compared to men, yet you wussed out and sided with him instead of a masculist brother. Yes you did debate a feminist over there but that good action was spoilt by your other actions I have explained above. Also, check his recent video about abortion to see other racist views of his.
By the way, if you listen to the video properly you will see my points against his, and you will see why I was right in calling him out.
I made a grave error coming here and thinking I would get comradeship from you.
Before I forget, here’s what your butt buddy (my opponent RV) doesn’t understand, as evidently you don’t too.
I told him this in his comments section, something which I’m sure you too wimps will only agree on:
“RV, you claimed that it was ‘unnatural’ for women to choose abortion, which means you think it is not commonplace. The fact that 42 million abortions have been carried out in a short timespan of 29 years suggests the exact opposite to what you were claiming. So stuff that up your pipe and smoke it.”
Luke, if you had half a brain you would have come to this conclusion yourself and would have not been suckered in like you obviously were.
So stick that up your pipe and smoke it.
Greg, I’ll say it again.
Even with my busy schedule, I’m more than happy to help you in a debate. But you need to be clear about exactly what points it is you want me to debate against.
If you had said in the beginning: “RV thinks that women are more compassionate than men. Here is a link to where he says this. Now come help me debate against that.”, then I would have known exactly what to do.
It’s no knock on you, but your instructions were vague, and left me guessing as to what exactly I was supposed to do.
Like I said before, I had no heads up that he had even made the claim that women are more compassionate than men. If I had known that he had made that claim, if you had pointed it out to me exactly where he said it, then I would have most certainly argued against it. But you didn’t. You expected me to read your mind, which of course I cannot do.
Again, this is no knock on you, this is just a call to you that I am not to blame, and that you need to provide more specific instructions in the future.
——————————————————————-
Regarding your comments on abortion:
It is most definitely unnatural for women to choose abortion. The 42 million abortions is a large number, a tragic number, but largeness of the number in no way implies that it is natural.
It is not natural. It is a byproduct of both feminism and our convenience culture.
——————————————————————–
Regarding your comments that I’m a “non-MRA” and a “fraud”:
That is most definately not true. I am a hardcore MRA who has burned feminist icons before and put videos of myself burning feminist icons on Youtube.
Regardless of your opinion of me, Masculist Man is the leader of the MRM, not you.
That means that Masculist Man or his designees are the only ones who can remove me from the MRM, not you.
And knowing that they know of my great service and dedication to the MRM, I know for a fact that I’m not going to be removed from the MRM just because I couldn’t read your mind.
Luke said this:
“Like I said before, I had no heads up that he had even made the claim that women are more compassionate than men. If I had known that he had made that claim, if you had pointed it out to me exactly where he said it, then I would have most certainly argued against it. But you didn’t. You expected me to read your mind, which of course I cannot do.”
Actually, RV read my points out in the video link, so it was OBVIOUS what claims I had made.
You then said this:
“Regardless of your opinion of me, Masculist Man is the leader of the MRM, not you.
That means that Masculist Man or his designees are the only ones who can remove me from the MRM, not you.
And knowing that they know of my great service and dedication to the MRM, I know for a fact that I’m not going to be removed from the MRM just because I couldn’t read your mind.”
You’ve got a lot to learn haven’t you. There is no ”leader” of the mrm, the mrm, moron, is a growing awareness and a gradual emergence of men realising what is happening to them due to feminist influence and sexism against them.
And while I enjoy some of masculistman’s posts, I see he is actually NOT liked by several mra’s and is even considered extreme. So to claim he is the ultimate leader is absurd.
Not even Angry Harry or Glenn Sacks are ”leaders”.
There are NO leaders sunshine, and you had better wake up to that fact and stop licking Masculist Man’s boots like you obviously do. I have read your posts regarding him, and you obviously have an unhealthy obsession with the man, as you look like a groveling wimp who can’t form his own opinion on life, and so needs the approval of an older man.
You are completely, and utterly, pathetic.
Greg.
Luke said this:
“Like I said before, I had no heads up that he had even made the claim that women are more compassionate than men. If I had known that he had made that claim, if you had pointed it out to me exactly where he said it, then I would have most certainly argued against it. But you didn’t. You expected me to read your mind, which of course I cannot do.”
Actually, RV read my points out in the video link, so it was obvious what claims I had made.
You then said this:
“Regardless of your opinion of me, Masculist Man is the leader of the MRM, not you.
That means that Masculist Man or his designees are the only ones who can remove me from the MRM, not you.
And knowing that they know of my great service and dedication to the MRM, I know for a fact that I’m not going to be removed from the MRM just because I couldn’t read your mind.”
You’ve got a lot to learn haven’t you. There is no ”leader” of the mrm, the mrm, moron, is a growing awareness and a gradual emergence of men realising what is happening to them due to feminist influence and sexism against them.
And while I enjoy some of masculistman’s posts, I see he is actually NOT liked by several mra’s and is even considered extreme. So to claim he is the ultimate leader is absurd.
Not even Angry Harry or Glenn Sacks are ”leaders”.
There are NO leaders sunshine, and you had better wake up to that fact and stop licking Masculist Man’s boots like you obviously do. I have read your posts regarding him, and you obviously have an unhealthy obsession with the man, as you look like a groveling wimp who can’t form his own opinion on life, and so needs the approval of an older man.
You are completely, and utterly, pathetic.
Greg.
I like Masculist Man’s posts and agree with him on nearly everything. I too am not liked by several MRAs and am even considered extreme. The fact is though that moderation will take something like 300 years to be sucessful (that’s about how long it took for Christianity to takeover Rome: eventually the Romans got tired of all the die-ins)… I don’t think I have it in me to live for 300 years. Also moderation will not achive results worth fighting for: females will still hold power, men will still be restricted. I’d rather the quick and dangerous road of infamy then the slow plodding course of sainthood; I want Victory In Our Time.
we should kill mike to practice for killing the women
And while I enjoy some of masculistman’s posts, I see he is actually NOT liked by several mra’s and is even considered extreme. So to claim he is the ultimate leader is absurd.
Are these “MRA’s” really MRA’s or just guys that say they are but when some woman plays her games these same “MRA’s” fall all over themselves to please her? Are these the same “MRA’s” that protest chivilary yet practice it when women show up? Are these the same “MRA’s” that hope to get “peace in our time” from an ENEMY that wants to DESTROY THEM AND ALL MEN? I’ve seen these “MRA’s?” and I’ll tell you one thing,I don’t want anything to do with those wussies so by them distancing themselves from me is a huge favor to me lest I be stained with their cowardice.
Whale boy, what I said to Mike goes for you too, and for everyone else. When you write wanton statements advocating indiscriminate killing on here, it both endangers me, and it endangers the people at my school who are trying to support me.
You can think whatever you want, I’m not telling you what to think, but know right now that there are people watching this blog who are not too friendly to our cause and who are looking for a reason to send the authorities, both college and possibly even government, after both me and those at my college who support me in this cause and aid me in doing this blog.
And as the person whom those people look up to, I cannot allow you to do things that put them in needless danger.
From now on if ANYONE writes any comment on here advocating indiscriminate killing, for the safety of myself and those who support me, I’m going to have to delete it.
Its for good reason we call them feminazis.
They are COWARDS and their evil ways are exposed. Their time is over.
Dont fear them.Film the bitches report on them
I see Luke didn’t counterclaim anything I said, despite him making a recent comment. And I see Masculist Man didn’t either, apart from when his own ego was bruised, and he went on the defensive about how no ”real mra” would want to be associated with him.
I notice Angry Harry, Hawiian Libertarian and No-Maam don’t even bother linking to masculistman, and yet these are very popular sites for a lot of masculists.
Hmmm, I guess I just thrashed your arse on that one, and emerged victorious like I always do.
And like I just said over at masculist man’s blog, here’s how this is gonna work: Luke will carry on sucking your cock wilst you pat his head and say ‘good bitch’ whilst I point and laugh in the background.
Goodbye and good riddance.
Greg.
whale sniffer wrote:
“we should kill mike to practice for killing the women”
Why should “we” kill me? I mean, if you want to you could try. I live under a pile of weapons though.
Greg wrote:
“ego was bruised”
Boom, that proves you’re a woman. Men don’t talk about egos being bruised, only women do; women who think they are superior to Men.
I notice Angry Harry, Hawiian Libertarian and No-Maam don’t even bother linking to masculistman, and yet these are very popular sites for a lot of masculists.
I am linked on this blog,on Pete Patriarch’s blog,on Bird’s eye blog among others. I was also linked on Fred X’s blog and Duncan’s blog. I have no idea why they don’t link to my blog because they haven’t made their reasons known to me. Are you telling me and everyone here that you are speaking on their behalf? Then since you are speaking on their behalf,I want anyone reading this post to go ahead and contact these guys and tell them their spokesman Greg is on the job,what is the reason they don’t link to me?
For anyone who doesn’t know Greg came over to my blog and insisted on me helping him out on an MRA manner,which I did. In fact he left two insistant posts demanding my attention:
Greg said…
Masculist Man, as a fan of your blog I am asking you as a fellow brother in arms to join me over at youtube where I am debating a bunch of male bashers. The users who comment are even worse than the guy who made the video in response to my points.
Heres the link brother:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2F4SlzsqcI
Greg.
September 24, 2007 12:04 PM
Greg said…
Masculist Man, again I ask you, as a fellow masculist, to join me over in the debate. I also ask all other masculists to do the same.
Greg.
September 24, 2007 4:52 PM
Source: here
I helped him,as did Luke and this is the thanks we get.
I see 2 sides; greg wanted support and was only standing up for males when that RV youtuber started claiming how compassionate and great women were. I’ve seen greg on youtube and he’s a legit masculist, and was following his adventures and found another mangina he debated;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aql1VOA6k8I
i do see how he came across and maybe was a bit rude but masculistman, you yourself are quite rude so you aren’t as innocent as your claiming either. i’m not taking anyone’s side, but maybe gregs just a little bit defensive but he doesnt come across like a NOW member to me. i think you all should just apologise to each other and then just focus on speaking about male rights as we are hurting the good fight by attacking each other.
if anyone is a little bit worrysome its mike, because hes a bit too extreme even by the most vocal of activists standards. i prefer a more peaceful and diplomatic approach personally.
“I prefer a more peaceful and diplomatic approach personally.”
When you’re young and have much life to live that is fine.
If as you get older and older and great change in favor of Men has not occured then you should turn to the path of violence:
If you’re 80 you have a good chance of die at any time, your life is nearing it’s ending point; you don’t lose as much if you die while taking part in an assault/revolt. Same goes for terminal illness.
[Greg]:
Greg, I didn’t counterclaim what you said because your claims are silly, and I already adequately defeated your claims in earlier posts. I don’t see any point wasting my time in a useless redundant battle with you. I’m already spread too thin as it is.
I tried to help you. Masc tried to help you. And you spit on our help. We won’t be helping you again. End of story.
-Luke
Next time, video this stuff and post it on YouTube. Most people still have these outdated stereotypes of young girls as “sugar & spice” Pollyanna victims…
So, it’s high time we let these nasty cvntbags show their true colors and hang themselves with their own ropes.
yeah, well we’re killing all the women, we should kill the blacks, jews, faggots, and the poor as well!!
MikeUSA: you are less than irrelevant, you live under a pile of semen-filled kleenex and star wars memorabilia.
Paul the Gay / Whaleboy:
This is your absolute last warning.
I’ve more than bent over backwards for you, and your constant need to break all the rules on my blog.
You would have been gone a long time ago if it hadn’t have been for the fact that you have been with me since January when I started this blog.
1.) You need to stop talking about killing people. It puts me and our whole side at risk.
2.) You need to choose one name, and stick to it.
If you can’t do both of those two things, then you’re out of here.
This is your last warning.
i will stop, thank u benevolent ruler
You’d better…