Jessica Valenti and Other Feminists are Scared of Competition from Sex Dolls

I recently ran across an article on feministing.com about men who have relationships with their sex dolls. I was actually not surprised so much by the men who had relationships with their dolls as I was by feministing.com owner Jessica Valenti’s reaction to the situation. Valenti obviously thinks that this is a feminist issue rather than a personal private issue, and she vehemently objects to these men’s choice of the dolls over a human girlfriend. Somehow in Valenti’s feminist mind, she believes that she is being “victimized” and “objectified” because these men chose the dolls over womyn like her.

And of course the feminists and collaborationists who frequent Feministing don’t miss the chance to chime in on the comment section, claiming that these men have ‘antisocial disorders’ and other nonesuch. Other feminist and collaborationist commenters say that because these men have these supposed disorders, they need to go to a psychiatrist. That is pure horseshit. Obviously what the feminists want to have happen is to have these men drugged into compliance with feminist social standards since they aren’t complying on their own.

Another reason why these feminists are so eager to slap labels on these men is that they saw that the men in the video are much happier with the dolls than they would be with a Western skank. Of course, according to feminists the problem is always with the men, and never with the feminazi environment that feminists and the mass media have created in the West, so thus they provide horseshit reasons to “explain” the men’s happiness: “These men are losers.” “These men are creepy.” “These men have disorders.” “These men are anti-social.”
The grand irony is that in actuality, American women (and Western women) are themselves the most antisocial and unapproachable women in the world, so what they are trying to do is slap labels on these men which in reality should be applied to themselves.

Western feminists have been scared shitless for a while about Western men finding high-quality wives in Eastern Europe, Russia, South America, and Asia. We already knew that there is no way that these Western women can compete with these ladies, who are both more beautiful and have much better personalities. So as we all know the American feminists ran along to the government and had them pass IMBRA as an attempt to prevent American men from even talking to foreign women.

Now what we’re hearing from Jessica Valenti is that not only are Amerikan womyn unable to compete with Eastern European, Russian, South American, and Asian women, they can’t even compete with a sex doll.

Valenti: “Fucking a sex toy is fine by me. Calling it your girlfriend and wishing that real women were like dolls (in that they can’t move, talk, etc) is not.” [her boldface]

So basically Valenti’s response to feminists’ and Western skanks’ inability to compete with a sex doll is to try to dictate people’s personal lives in what they can and cannot do, and what love should and should not be. As for me, if people want to love a doll, that’s fine by me. Personally, I’d prefer an exotically beautiful lady from Russia, Eastern Europe, or maybe even Asia or South America. (But I’ll admit, if my only choices were the doll and Ameriskanks/Western Skanks, I’d date the doll before ever dating another Western or American skank in 99.9% of cases.)

Regardless, it isn’t Valenti’s or any feminist’s place to tell people what love should or shouldn’t be. People’s personal lives should be off-limits from feminist dictators.

Endnote: I’d like to thank Feminist Scum, who was the one who initially highlighted this issue. Feminist Scum has been doing an excellent job lately of keeping an eye on and blowing the whistle on Jessica Valenti and feministing.com, which is one of the biggest sources of hatred against men on the internet. So let this be both a thanks for his efforts, and an encouragement to keep up his work in this most essential task.