Photos 3 — Rydzyna, Poland

By far my favorite place I visited in Poland.

YES!!!! TV Commercials Urge Kicking U.N. out of U.S.

This is really making me uber-excited because I always thought I was the only one who wanted to see not only the US out of the UN, but the UN kicked out of the US. But thanks to the power of the internet, I have found this whole great big group of people that wants to kick the U.N. out of the U.S. And they have made two TV commercials about kicking the U.N. out of the U.S.

And here is a special bonus video of U.N. flags being burnt.

I love how she asks “Did you get a permit for that fire”, and he says “No”, and she says “YAAAAAYY!”. To hell with permits. “Permit for a fire”, lol — What is this, Nazi Germany?

With the kind of attitude that I’m seeing on that video, the cops wouldn’t even dare to come over to their house and bug those people for not having a “fire permit”, even if the cops saw the video. The cops would just say “oh well”, and go back to whatever they had been doing before. Now that is what I call true freedom.

I’ve been hearing a lot lately that New Hampshire (where this was filmed) is the most freedom loving state in the USA. I always thought it was Michigan, but it might be N.H.

Aaron Russo, Tax Cheats, and a Belligerent Government

Aaron Russo along with his merry band of conspiracy theorists recently became involved with a group of people that believed that they don’t have to pay income taxes and/or file tax returns (many of whom have actually refused to pay/file). Now the Aaron Russo conspiracy theorists looked and saw yet another opportunity for themselves to create commotion and thus joined forces with these tax protesters and added their familiar “anti-Rockefeller platform” and “anti-international-banker platform” to the tax protesters’ chorus, claiming that income tax in America is just another way for Rockefeller and other international bankers to get rich.

Now here are the pertaining video clips that show when/where this all happened:

Now because we are dealing with an extremely touchy legal issue, I am obliged to say right off the bat that the law in this case is on the government’s side. You can find the law in Title 26 of the US Code, and it says that you do have to pay income taxes. You may not agree with them, I know that neither I nor my father do, but in the end you do have to pay them.

And just in case anyone here needs it spelled out, the conspiracy theorist argument that income tax all goes into the pockets of Rockefeller and the international bankers that they all love to demonize and is total garbage with no factual basis.

Okay now with that being said, both sides were very much in the wrong with regard to how they acted in this situation, and thus I have some nasty things to say to both sides. I have some nasty things to say to the Aaron Russo conspiracy theorists who have found yet another way to act like nutballs running wild subverting this country, and I also have some nasty things to say to the government that felt the need to pull a King George III belligerence routine rather than simply to take ten minutes for an aide to point out Title 26 to these people and say “This is the law that says you have to pay.”

Now first I will address the Aaron Russo conspiracy theorists gone tax cheats:

You pretend that you are interested in the well being of this country — you are not.

You pretend that you are interested in fixing the system — you are not.

What you are interested in is subverting this country because you hold insane beliefs that Rockefeller is the Boogeyman and Rothschild is Freddy Kruger, and they’re engaged in this entire conspiratoria involving Illuminati, Freemasons, fairies, witches, lions, tigers and bears. And I knew that it was only a matter of time before you kooks got involved in some serious lawbreaking that would land many of you straight into prison.

And not only did many of you go to prison, a lot of other people are undoubtably going to prison on account of you because there are so many people who think every word that comes out of Aaron Russo’s mouth is gold, when in fact it is mostly lies. And said people are undoubtedly listening to Aaron Russo, and they are redoubtably not paying their taxes and/or not filing returns, and they are undoubtedly going to go to prison because of that. It’s absolutely disgusting, because it’s like the tale of the Pied Piper, except that this time the Pied Piper is leading everybody straight into prison.

You conspiracy theorists need to stop doing what you’re doing. You’ve gone from having a reputation for being crazy to having a reputation for both that and for allying with people who cheat on taxes. And now the government really has an eye on all of you and regards you as dangerous people who need to be monitored. And I absolutely can’t blame them for that because of the activities that you have been involved in. And quite frankly if I were the government, I would have started monitoring your asses a long time ago.

My hope is that when those of you conspiracy theorists who have gone to federal prison over this get out of federal prison, it will have a rehabilitative effect on you, and in a few years you will come out of prison ready to be productive members of society rather than crazy insane conspiracy theorists who are a detriment to society.
And my other hope is that those of you conspiracy theorists who have not gone to federal prison are seeing from your friends who are going to federal prison that there are consequences to be paid for your actions, and no amount of whining about Rockefeller and Rothschild are going to save you from those consequences if you step over the line.

And now I am going to address the arrogant government that chose belligerence over its duty to inform the public of what the law is when the public asked what the law is:

The reason why you did not cite the law when asked even though you could easily have done so, and instead said essentially “because the government said so”, is that you want to get to the point where any of your officials can simply issue an edict and when we all ask why we have to all follow it, you can simply say “because the government said so”, whether or not the edict is actually backed by a law. And you were using this income tax protestor situation in order to try to cement that into the public mind.

Government, if you had said to Russo and pals, “listen, you clowns are not important enough for busy Congressmen and IRS Comissioners to waste their time on, but we will send an aide to meet with you and tell you where the law is that you have to follow”, and that aide subsequently pointed out the relevant portions of USC Title 26, then that would have been enough, and you Government would have totally been in the right, and the Russo conspiracy theory wackjobs would have been totally in the wrong (except for the fact that the income tax itself is socialist, goes to worthless social programs that we don’t need, and benefits mainly bums and freeloaders when it isn’t outright wasted). But because of the miserable way in which you handled the situation, the 80% in your favor, 20% in their favor stance that I would have ordinarily have taken has been reduced to a 50-50 split. So I’m 50% in your favor, but I’m also 50% in their favor. Or more accurately, I’m 50% opposed to them in this context, but also 50% opposed to you in this context.

You need to wake up and realize that the age of King Xerxes is over, and we are in the age of rule by law. And rule by law entails that not only are you obliged to have government by laws rather than by arbitration, but that when the citizenry is unclear about what the law is, you are obliged to pull out the law book and instruct them as to what the law is. Because rule by law doesn’t mean much of anything unless the citizenry is able to know what the law is.

And one last thing: don’t even think about giving me the excuse of “Well we put it on our IRS website”, which is the excuse that some of your apologists have given for why the Aaron Russo people should have known.
The fact is you did that after the situation had long ended. Not when the Aaron Russo people asked.

Stop State-Sponsored Eco-Fascism

I read something on “fishforums.com” that absolutely disgusted me to my core.

Restrictions - The following U.S. states have restrictions on freshwater stingrays. They are either illegal to own or you need proper permits (usually only for educational or research reasons).:
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Nevada
Oklahoma
Texas
Utah

“Restrictions?” What the hell is this? Why does the government need a law telling people they can’t own a stingray? They are the most affectionate animals on this planet, and barring the populace from owning them is nothing short of fascism. I smell a rat. Or to be more precise, rats, as in plural. Leftist radical environmentalist lobbyist rats.

The state has no interest in keeping people from owning stingrays. The only reason why this law exists is that the politicians who made it are spineless cowards who bow down to the eco-fascist lobby.

The other thing about this law is that it is totally unenforceable. What are they going to do? Are they going to have random searches of people’s houses to make sure that they don’t have any stingrays? Sorry, but the People won’t put up with that for very long.

So in the end, I have a message for all the politicans who were responsible for making these laws in these states.:

• Stop bowing down to the eco-fascist lobby.
• Stop being corrupt. Stop taking money, meals, gifts, etc. from lobbyists.
• Think about how a law will affect your constituents before you make it. You’re harming people by voting for laws that are based on lies that were told to you by the eco-fascist lobby.
• Stop creating fascist laws that promote nothing good, and can’t even be enforced anyway, and which will waste the government’s time and taxpayer money down the road trying to enforce something that can’t possibly be enforced.
• And if you can’t do that, then you should be tossed out of office.

Don’t Vote for Obama Bin Laden

If you vote for Obama, this is who you’re voting for:

Out-of-Control Judges — Part 1

The Founding Fathers simply did not put enough checks and balances on the judicial branch of this country. And I don’t believe it was their fault, either. The judicial branch of this country was supposed to be a very weak branch, but it has usurped more power than anybody would have envisioned in their wildest dreams that it would usurp, so almost no checks and balances were at the ready.

I’m going to start out this segment about these out-of-control judges with the example of a judge who lost control of himself and sent his entire courtroom to jail for almost no reason. 46 people were sent to the city jail, and 14 people who couldn’t pay bail were shipped off to the county jail, and not released until the late afternoon.

And even after this incident had concluded, it took two whole years to finally get that judge off the bench.

There’s just no accountability, there’s absolutely no accountability for what they do in their courtrooms. He needed more than just to be removed from the bench. He needed to go to jail himself. Why? Because he unduly sent those people to jail. That’s why. And the amount of time that he needs to spend in there is the total amount of man-hours that everybody that he sent there spent in there.

Now for the 32 people that had the money to post bail who were only taken to the city jail, it sounds like maybe it was a 2 hour ordeal for each one of them. For those 14 that did not have the money to post bail and who were bussed first to the city jail, and then bussed to the country jail where they were not released until the late afternoon, that sounds like a 6 hour ordeal for each one of them. So if you add all that up, that’s 32*2 + 14*6 = 148 man-hours. Therefore this judge needs to spend 6 days and 4 hours in jail for what he did.

Judicial accountability. Not judicial immunity.

Liberals who Burn the Flag

I was absolutely appaled when the flag-burning amendment failed to pass the senate by one vote. By one stinking liberal democrat vote. It would have been a great amendment that would have made this country stronger.

If that amendment would have passed, then flag burning would be illegal, as it should be. Well there’s no reason why we can’t try again, but we’ll have to get more incumbent democrats out of Congress before we can be successful in that.

Now when this amendment is finally passed, the punishment for breaking it will be that the offender will remain in jail until he agrees to be the main event in a special ceremony. He can stay one minute in jail, or a year in jail for all I care, but until he agrees to be the main event in the ceremony, he will not leave.

Now, this is the way that these ceremonies will go:

There will be many decorations and many festivities, first of all.
And when the liberal who burned the flag walks on stage, he will be booed. First he will walk up to the microphone, and he will say into the microphone how he loves the USA and how he loves Bush, and how he will never burn the flag again.

And then he will put his hand over his heart like a good American and he will say the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, while facing a great big huge flag which will be hanging from the ceiling. And then he will put his hand over his heart again, and he will say the Pledge of Allegiance to the President* while facing a huge picture of Bush (or McCain, when McCain becomes president next January and replaces Bush) which will be hanging from the ceiling   And then he will be presented with a smaller flag and a smaller picture of Bush (or McCain), and he will kiss the flag and the picture of Bush. He will then be cheered, and then even more festivities will begin.

Also, the government will have a State-owned TV channel through which these ceremonies will be broadcast on national television for all to see, and the money for that TV channel, and for the cameramen, the soundmen, and for the ceremonies themselves will be taken out of government entitlements for women, minorities, and welfare bums.

—————————————-

*When I was a freshman, I thought up that if there is a Pledge of Allegience to the Flag, then there should certainly be a Pledge of Allegience to the President.

I WILL NOT be a Toothless Chivalrous Rat!

GL just said another thing that I REALLY didn’t like. He said that men were hardwired to be attracted to younger women, and as a consequence of that, we all ought to go to Russia and be chivalrous. And he actually used the word chivalry, too.

I didn’t rebel against the front side of feminism so that I could pack up and go to Russia and then bow down to chivalry, which is nothing but the flip side of feminism.

Jesus Christ, if you want a young beautiful girl, come over here to the USA and get yourself into fights, they love that. Or get yourself a hooker. Or just wait for them all to get really drunk at a party and then they’ll all climb on you and do things to you that are not appropriate for me to list on this blog. It really isn’t that hard.

But WHATEVER YOU DO, do NOT turn into a toothless, chivalrous rat. because chivalry is nothing more than the flip side of feminism. It’s nothing more than bowing down to the matriarchy. And when men bow down to the matriarchy, then the matriarchy gets stronger and stronger with every time they bow down to it. So don’t do it.

Real Men and Fake Men

For a long time, Rexpat and Socon have been calling themselves and a certain number of other people “Real Men.” And they have justified this by saying that they are really good at passing “invisible tests” and having characteristics on this “list of characteristics” which they and GL wrote.

And they have said that I and others are “Fake Men” because we don’t have the things on the “list of characteristics” and we failed the “invisible tests”.

Well there is just one problem there. This year, there is going to be a Marathon, right where I live at school.

You read that right. Marathon. 26.2 miles of grueling terrain, and the ultimate test of strength, valor, and “Realness” of a man.

And it is going to be me, whom they call a “Fake Man” versus what they call “Real Men”. Me whom they call a “Non-Traditional Man” versus what they call “Traditional Men”.
I am the sum total of everything that these so-called “Real Men” and so-called “Traditional Men” hate. I am Mr. Analytical, Mr. Socially Unacceptable, Mr. Fat Ego, and Mr. Prozac all rolled into one.

I am Mr. Analytical because I am very mathematical and analytical.

I am Mr. Socially Unacceptable because I have never in my life given a damn about what society thinks about me.

I am Mr. Fat Ego because I continue to defeat them and lord it over them even though I am Mr. Socially Unacceptable.

And I am Mr. Prozac because I go into the Berserkergang rage.
But still I shall conquer. Still I shall defeat every Mr. Non-Analytical, Mr. Socially Acceptable, Mr. Charity Giver, and Mr. Sane-and-Stable that they will throw at me.

In other words, let’s just see how “Real” these “Real Men” are when they must run against me for 26.2 miles over grueling terrain. And let’s just see how “Fake” I am when faced with the same challenge.

………………………………..

But I am not just fighting for myself. I am fighting for every single man that Rexpat and Socon have called a “Fake Man”, and have denounced and insulted their honor.

And I am fighting for every single man that GL has called a “Mr. Analytical” or a “Mr. Socially Unacceptable” or a “Mr. Fat Ego or a “Mr. Prozac”, and has claimed don’t have traditional characters.

Well tonight I shall prove that all of us DO have traditional characters. We have the characters from Traditional times long gone by. From times when men proved themselves through glorious deeds, instead of through “lists” and through “invisible tests”.

Because tonight there will be no “lists” or “invisible tests” for these so-called “Real Men” to hide behind. There will only be Twenty-Six Point Two Miles of grueling terrain.

For if I am victorious over these so-called “Real Men”, then it shall prove that we are truly the ones who are the Real Men and the Traditional Men, and all of the “Real Men” are truly the ones who are the Fake Men and the Non-Traditional Men.

So all of you Mr. Analyticals, Mr. Socially Unacceptables, Mr. Fat Egos and Mr. Prozacs, and all the Others whom They have called Fake Men: Raise your arms high into the air and listen to me:

There will be no charity work or 12-steppers for us tonight.

Tonight is the night when we conquer.

Tonight is the night when we WIN, and prove that WE are truly the Real Men, and that they are the Fake Men.

And when we have defeated all of them, we shall all go to Russia to celebrate!

I Have No Business Being On Stage

GL said something that was totally untrue. He was trying to divide people up into categories, and was dividing people up into “people who have business being on stage”, and “people who have no business being on stage”. I find this division to be totally untrue.

Here is what he said:

Now this may seem like a silly example but I want you to imagine that your decision to come to Russia or the FSU to look for a wife is very much like deciding that you want to be on American Idol.

You either understand that you are a REAL SINGER who has a legitimate shot at success..

OR

You are just trying to mimic your way through and hope to not screw up too badly when in fact everyone in the audience can spot you out for the nervous newbie that you are.  And they all make the conclusion that you have no business being on stage.

Well guess what, when my power metal band first started, we tried to find a singer, but we couldn’t find one, so I myself had to sing for the band for the entire year. So in short I probably have no business being on stage, either.

And the drummer didn’t/doesn’t have any business being on stage either because when the drummer first started drumming for the band, the drummer had only been drumming for about 1 month. (But when he hears power metal, he launches into this mode that really brings out the best in him, and makes him sound a lot like Thomen Stauch when Stauch was his age.) But still, he has no business being on stage.

And the guitarist doesn’t have any business being on stage, because the guitarist is a blues guitarist who never had even heard of power metal in his entire life when he first started with us, so he has no business being on stage.

And the bass guitarist has no business being on stage, because the bass guitarist is a blues guitarist, not a power metal guitarist, and he had never even heard of power metal either, so he has no business being on stage.

And the keyboardist has no business being on stage because the keyboardist is a classical pianist, not a power metal keyboardist, and he had never even heard of power metal, either.

And there’s one other singer who I’m going to have be a backup singer, and I’ve worked with him before so he’s sung power metal before, but when you listen to him, it sounds like he might be mimicking Tony Kakko / me, so therefore he’s “mimicking his way through”, so he has no business being on stage. Besides, he’s only been singing for about 8 months. He has no business being on stage.

So in summa, the entire band has no business being on stage.
But even though we have no business being on stage, we somehow lucked out and did well enough for the band to gain a lot of renown throughout the school, so in GL-speak we ended up being in that percentage of people that was “probably going to be extremely disappointed” but for whom that “probably” just didn’t translate into “actually”.

Anyway now I finally do have a real singer who is an excellent singer and has sung his whole life, and while I’m happy that he’s now going to be singing, some of my fans aren’t, and have openly complained to me about the switch. I reassure them that I’m still going to be playing the electric violin as always, and that calms them down a little bit.

Come to think of it, the new singer doesn’t have any business being on stage either, because the singer is a rhythm & soul singer, and hadn’t ever heard of power metal in his entire life until about two months ago, and hasn’t rehearsed with us yet, so he’s never sung power metal in his life, and has never sung in a band in his life, so he has no business being on stage.

But now that I think about it, he’s going to have to wait till the second concert to sing this semester.

I’m going to sing one last time, and I’m going to start out the concert by saying:

I am ______  __________, and I have ABSOLUTELY NO BUSINESS BEING ON THIS STAGE.

So to any aspiring power metal band, or any power metal band at all, I would hope that you would do it because that’s what you feel, rather than whether you did or didn’t have “business being on stage”. And I would hope that would be true whether you were Mr. Analytical, Mr. Socially Unacceptable, Mr. Money, Mr. Prozac, or any other category anybody can possibly come up with.

Bob Allen Should Give A Speech at the Next MGTOW Conference

(Note: This post was written around Dec. 1, but I haven’t posted it until now)

I actually had almost never heard of Bob Allen until a few weeks ago. I knew that he was an MRA blogger, but I hadn’t ever gone on his blog until Robin Steele tried to have him shut down, and I had to go on his blog to warn him that she was trying to do that.

After sending Bob that warning about Steele, I stayed around a bit and looked at some of his articles. The skinny is that Bob Allen is a libertarian philosopher Although I don’t agree with everything he says, Bob’s got a real aggressive spirit and a real lust for freedom just like the early patriots did in the American Revolution, which is an extremely rare thing nowadays, even in America.

And the icing on the cake is that it says on his website that Bob is available to give speeches.
Although we’d still have to pay him for his plane ticket, meals, lodging, and honorarium, I can’t imagine us not getting some sort of a discount on the honorarium because we’re all MRA’s and all on the same side. This is good because the MRM has almost no money. Of course we’ll pay him whatever we’re able, though.

The one obstacle I see is getting an audience for Bob. In addition to the money shortage, the MRM has always had a man shortage as well (although I hear that this shortage used to be even worse than it is now, and has gotten better in recent years). This could very well cause low attendance at the Conference such that there aren’t enough people to warrant him taking the time to write and prepare a speech, and to fly out to whereever we are to give it. For example, clearly, it would be totally unreasonable to have Bob fly out to give a speech when only five people are going to be there.

All things considered, I think the lower limit is 15 people. Even that is lower than what most philosophers would be willing to fly out to give a speech to, but Bob isn’t oblivious to the fact that this is the MRM, and we have a man shortage in the MRM. Bob also isn’t oblivious to the fact that MRA’s are really hardcore people, and it takes 100 or more feminists just to make 1 MRA.

So if we can get 15 people to reserve for the 2008 MGTOW Conference, then we should give Bob a call and arrainge for him to be one of the speakers.
Again, we don’t have to agree with everything he says in his speech, that’s not the point of this. Even if you disagree with Bob Allen, it’s important to consider other points of view, especially from within your own side.

The Blue Gun Thugs — Revisited

Today at about 11:30 at night while I was walking to the store, I had a guy come up to me essentially try to start a fight with me. He came up to me on the street in a menacing manner and basically gave me the whole “HEY WHERE’RE YOU GOING” speech while standing literally two inches from my face and not letting me past. Now obviously this guy had no idea who I am, and that I have had this sort of thing happen to me in the rough parts of Detroit before, so he was taken aback by the fact that I held my ground and didn’t even flinch, So after about 30 seconds of standing two inches from my face, and me not budging, he eventually called me a “fucking freak”, and walked away.

This whole incident reminds me once again that there is just no way that the police, or what Bob Allen calls the Blue Gun Thugs, can possibly do an effective job of protecting the populace. Usually all the Blue Gun Thugs can do is go to the scene of the crime after the fact, investigate, and try to catch the criminal after the crime has happened. They have almost no ability to prevent a crime from happening. And here it’s even worse, because there are only 3 police in the entire town, yet none of the students are allowed to be armed. I just have to say that I’m just glad that I’m 6′ 1″ with a lean, athletic 170 lb body, and most of all — an unparalleled tolerance for pain which has won me almost every fight I have ever gotten into in the past.

Anyway, there’s almost no protection here except for your own fists. And that isn’t going to do you a lot of good if the other guy manages to get a weapon onto campus.

Anyway, back to the Blue Gun Thugs. The Blue Gun Thugs have almost no ability to prevent crime from happening. The only thing that can do that is an armed society. Now because I go to this ridiculous college I’m not allowed to carry a weapon here, but I can guarantee you that if people did generally carry weapons here, the incident that happened to me today would not have happened. Therefore not only do I believe in the Second Amendment, I believe that the Second Amendment is something that does not stop when one walks onto a college campus. It might stop when one enters college-owned buildings, but when one is out and about on a public street which happens to coincide with the campus, like I was today, it certainly does not stop, even though college officials delude themselves into thinking that it stops.

It says “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” And obviously there is a reason for that, and the reason is what I just told you about today.

Kick Out the U.N.

There have been numerous people who have written articles about abolishing the U.N. I agree, but the truth is that they are a bunch of Rats, and they themselves are not going to abolish themselves, so it will be up to a few brave individual nations to rectify this situation. And the first and most important of these nations is the United States.

There is absolutely no reason why the United States should be in the Rat Organization in the first place. They do nothing but take money from us in order to fund their ridiculous programs, and what is worse, they erode our sovereignty through their reckless internationalism. What needs to happen is that the United States needs to leave the Rat Organization.

And after the United States has left the Rat Organization I can almost guarantee you that the Rats will be so presumptuous to assume that their Rathouse will be allowed to remain in New York. This is not the case. The soil that that Rathouse is on is American soil, not Rat soil. Therefore the Rats will be required to airlift the Rathouse out of the country.

The President will make an Executive Order saying that the Rats have three months to airlift each and every brick of the Rathouse out of the United States, and if in three months the Rathouse is not gone, then the Rathouse will be demolished and the rubble hauled off to the dump at the Rats’ expense.

In either case, after the Rats have airlifted the Rathouse out of the United States, or after the Rathouse has been demolished and the rubble hauled off to the dump, any foreign Rats will be immediately taken to the nearest deportation center and deported to their respective countries. And they will never be allowed to enter the United States again as long as they live.

Dr. Evil the Disgrace

Dr. Evil is a complete disgrace.

I don’t agree with Rob Fedders’ assessment that the MRM has gotten nowhere, but it could have gone a lot farther in the pre-2006 years (before the big internet explosion) if clowns like Evil hadn’t have been in charge.

I’ve seen his mangina act, and I’m totally disgusted.

The name of his site should not be called “Stand Your Ground”.

It should be called “Give Up Your Ground”, because that is what he is causing to happen.

Also, don’t think that I haven’t read the “Captain-Save-A-Ho” act that he did on Fred X, and how he railroaded Lord Feverstone. Utterly inexcusible.

Actually I just went on his site right now, and read through it and it’s even worse than I thought.

He has this ridiculous “warning system” in which he gives “warnings” to people for little or no reason. And in case you think it’s just people like Masculist Man and MikeeUSA who get these warnings, it’s not.

He gave a warning to Yan Yan for Christ’s sake. He even gave a warning to Percy! He even gave a warning to MAUS!

Next thing you know he’ll be giving “warnings” to Angry Harry!

It’s absolutely ridiculous.

What the hell has he ever done to fight against feminism? Nothing.

And no, sorry, but making a tiny little list of “companies to boycott”, and going to the government begging for “equality” does not count.

All he’s done is sit and give “warnings” and disrupt the people that are truly trying to fight against feminism.

What does count — and it counts against him — is the fact that in the face of a terrible enemy, he has dropped the ball time and time again.

Protest Against Diversity Bigots

Antifeminist Protest Against “Take Back the Night”

Conspiracy Theorists on Antimisandry

I’ve been picking on feminists a lot as you all know.

Now I’m going to start picking on another group of people that I don’t like — illuminati conspiracy theorists.

Illuminati conspiracy theorists infested antimisandry.com, and I gave them all negative reputation marks in retribution for spreading their conspiracy theories around and diverting from meaningful discussion.

I thought that when they received the negative reputation marks, it would cause them to stop cluttering up the board with illuminati conspiracy theories, but instead they all ganged up on me and gave me all sorts of negative reputation marks, and gave themselves all sorts of positive reputation marks which more than undid the negative reputation marks that I gave them for cluttering up the board with the conspiracy theories.

Antimisandry.com is my favorite MRA forum, and it’s supposed to be a place to discuss men’s issues.

It’s not supposed to be a place to discuss “illuminati” fantasy conspiracy theories.

That stuff belongs in a nuthouse, not on any respectable board.

There are tons of nuthouse boards that these conspiracy theorists could go on to talk about their nut conspiracy theories. But when they spread it onto MRA boards like Antimisandry, then it becomes a problem, because it takes away from meaningful discussion and makes it seem to guests like the board is run by a bunch of loonies, and it makes it seem like the MRM is run by a bunch of loonies.

These conspiracy theorists simply do not think ahead about the people that they affect. They affect every single legitimate member that resides on the board by damaging the board’s reputation, and by damaging the MRM’s reputation.

Picture this. You come upon an MRA board, and people are saying on the board:

“Feminism is caused when pink frogs jump into women’s ears and tell them to hate men. So in order to stop feminism, let’s all go out and buy pink frog repellent”.

That’s just as bad as:

“Feminism is caused when the Illuminati tells the CIA to start doing Mind Control Programming on everybody then women become feminist.”

They’re both so outlandish that even a 3 year old should know that neither of them are true. And when guests see either of them on an MRA board, then guests think: Wow, these guys obviously belong in the loony bin. Screw this board, I’m going on a board where I can at least find some measure of logical thought. Screw the MRM, they obviously can’t even put any logical thought together.

Anyway, I’ve read all Billy’s and others’ little hate posts about how I’m a coward, and about how horrible I am. And I’m not stupid; I knew they would come.

But I’m fine because I know I did the right thing, even though what I tried to do with regard to the fantasy conspiracy theorists unfortunately didn’t work.

Beyond The Black Hole

Note to readers: My power metal band also has a song about going into a black hole, and although Gamma Ray is a great band, I actually think that ours is better than this.

Anyway, I wish that there was a way to take all the feminists to a black hole and convince them that there was money in there or something, or that their perfect world where women rule over men was in there, and then have them go in there and never come out again.

Robin Steele Exposed — Part 2

Robin Steele claims to be a “peace activist”. She also has recently claimed to be a “men’s rights activist”. She is neither of those things. She is a feminazi, and a female supremacist. And I have proof — right here.

So let’s begin with a look at one of her posts, entitled A Call for Peace!

(Note: I can’t fit the entire thing on here. Please click on the image to see the rest of it).

This is the post where she wants you all to believe that she’s a “peace activist”, who wants to “stop the violence” and “end the hate”. Don’t fall for it. First of all, why would a “peace activism post” have the URL womanofsteele.blogspot.com/2007/10/imbra-was-just-beginning_31.html ?
Why is “imbra-was-just-beginning” part of the URL? What does peace activism have to do with IMBRA? Let’s have a closer look and see what this post truly is.

(Again, I can’t fit the entire thing on here, so you’re going to have to click on it to view it.)

This is what Robin Steele’s “Call for Peace” really is.

Now I realize this is a bit scrambled since I got it out of Google Cache a long time ago, but I’ll decode the relevant parts for you.

The header says: Robin Steele: IMBRA was just the beginning! Support your sisters! Defeat the cretins!

And the post, if you look closely says:

The time has come to end the predatory use of the Internet to perpetuate violence against women!
The time has come for women of all races, faiths, and nationalities to join together as one!
We are smarter.
We are focused.
We have the power.
And we are seizing control.
IMBRA was just the beginning.
The time has come.
The future is ours.

Support your sisters!

Defeat the Cretins!

[Tags: female domination, feminism, feminist, imbra, internet predators, male subservience, online dating rights, women rule, women's rights]

Wow. That’s a lot different from the “call for peace” ploy that she put up to cover for herself, now isn’t it. Make sure you catch the taglines that clearly say “female domination”, “male subservience”, and “women rule”.

But that’s not all. Take a look at her sidebar, and you’ll see that the IMBRA Overview, Feministing, Feminist Blogs, Tahirih Justice Center [the ones who were responsible for IMBRA], and the Feminist Majority Foundation are listed under a category labeled “Women of STEELE!” And she tells us she’s not a feminazi?

And look at a few of the things that are listed under the category called “DEFEAT THE CRETINS”.

Men’s News Daily, Chris Key, Veterans Abroad, and Online Dating Rights are “Cretins” according to her.

Men’s News Daily is a cretin? Men’s News Daily is nothing more than an MRA newspage for men’s issues, which are often sadly ignored by the mainstream media.

And this is even more interesting, because Robin recently wrote a post in which she accused KhankrumtheBulgar of lying when he said that she said that Men’s News Daily is a “hate site”. Actually she did change the header “DEFEAT THE CRETINS” to “HATE SITES” at one point, and unfortunately I don’t have a screenshot of it so she’ll slip the noose on that one, but anyway it’s pretty clear that KhankrumtheBulgar wasn’t lying, and that Robin is the one who is lying.

Chris Key is a cretin? Chris Key is a very polite young man, exceptionally mature for his age, who has given nothing more than logical, factual argumentation for his entire career as an MRA, and he is incredibly strict about not going any farther than logic and facts will allow him to go. Perhaps the strictest in the entire MRM on that point.

Veterans Abroad and Online Dating Rights [whom she calls Veterans without A BROAD and ODeR] are cretins? Hmm, it would seem to me that they’re men who are trying to fight against the anti-male law IMBRA. Is that what constitutes a “cretin” in her eyes? I suppose so.

I also noticed that NAMBLA is on her list of cretins, as is the National Sex Offender Registry. So she’s trying to imply that MRA’s are on the same level as NAMBLA and sex offenders?

And last but not least, look at her welcome message:

It says:

WELCOME SISTERS!

We’re glad you’re here!
IMBRA was just the beginning of a new era!
We’re Stronger. Smarter. & in Control.
We’re Women of Steele

So, basically a reiteration of the same old pro-IMBRA, anti-MRA, pro-female-supremacy screed.

But that’s not all folks…

Wait until you see what Robin has to say about opponents of IMBRA.

Again, it’s a bit scrambled since I got it from Google Cache a long time ago, so I’ll decode while you follow along with the screenshotted copy.

Many IMBRA Foes in Denial About their Sexuality

 

Since “man” cannot live by internet porn, phone sex, and mail order bride fantasy sites alone, there are a number of sophmoric Cretins running immature, moronic, anti-woman, anti-IMBLA hate sites, forums, and blogs with the time that normal males would be spending with real female companionship. These perpetual adolescents strut incessently, talking big and bold behind their fake names and faux manly personas, complaining about American women and feminists and pretending that they’re home every night, typing with onen hand, by choice.

 

Most all of these guys are compensating for something… social awkwardness, impotence, latent homosexuality, insecurity, tiny penises, acne, or obesity. Too bad that instead of raising themselves up, they put their energy into tearing women down.
A particularly pathetic example is called Men’s Rights Board here on blogspot. Like most of these sites, it’s run by a guy too cowardly to use his real name (lest his mother or husky Polish wife read it and make him put the ball gag back on) This guy calls himself (get this the “Masculist Man.” Gay enough for ya? A name obviously inspired by a Village People song.

 

He has a really bad illustration of a cartoon character grasping the phallic shaft of a sword held erect. The character is so cowardly he wears glasses and a kerchief over his face. He has just hacked the arm off a chained skeleton. Is this the poster graphic for impotence or what?

Sad, really. Some misogyist-in-training college kid leaves adoring messages for The Masculist, who doesn’t have the stories to tell the kid (in italics below) what’s obvious to any outside observerL the kid’s fruitier than a nutcake.

So okay, let me get this straight. Oppose IMBRA, and you’re an obese, acne covered, insecure, socially awkward impotent homosexual with a tiny penis. Riiiight.

 

But that’s still not all folks.

Robin Steele has been creating and using fake MRA personas with the intent to mislead and deceive the MRM. One such persona is eMasculist Man, a.k.a emasculist. eMasculist Man a.k.a emasculist used to post”pro-MRA” stuff on Masculist Man’s blog, my blog, and Robin’s blog, such as the following:

eMasculist a.k.a eMasculist Man also had a blog called “eMasculist Man” at emasculist.blogspot.com, which was basically a parody of Masculist Man’s Men’s Rights Blog, but now we can’t access is because for whatever reason it’s open to invite only now.

Now several MRA’s including myself became convinced that eMasculist a.k.a eMasculist Man was Robin Steele, but we unfortunately never had any ironclad proof. Until now, that is.

Have a look at this readout from my admin page, showing the stats for a comment from eMasculist Man, and the stats from a comment from Robin Steele, side by side.

You’ll notice that the IP addresses from both eMasculist Man and Robin Steele are the same, proving that eMasculist Man a.k.a eMasculist is, in fact, Robin Steele.

But that’s still not all folks…

Does anyone here remember the militant female supremacist Athena Y? You know, the one who left the following comments endorsing female supremacy:

Now a some MRA’s were again very clever, and initially (correctly) suspected Athena Y of being Robin Steele. But yet again, they had no proof. That is, until Robin Steele goofed up and accidentally blew her cover by signing one of her posts “Athena Y” while she was still logged in as “Robin Steele”.

You can see how the very next poster immediately calls her out on it.

So in the end I say…Robin Steele, you tried to fool and manipulate the MRM.

But now you have failed because you have been exposed.

The game is up Steele, but thanks for playing.

Men’s Rights Activist,

Luke Skywalker

Robin Steele Exposed — Part 1: Steele LIED About MRM Websites

Feminazi blogger Robin Steele has been flat out lying about the MRM for a long time now, and it’s high time that both she and her ridiculous claims are exposed. In her post, Angry Harry vs. Feministing Part 1, Steele gives fake reasons for the fake claim that that the MRM congragates in “cotentious little cliques”, “small forums”, “low-traffic blogs”, “insular” groups, and other such rubbish. (Here is her full quote):

DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR
The
MRM is currently made up of a contentious little cliques of injured men
who gather in small forums and low-traffic blogs and rant and rave to
each other about how their inadequacies are all due to their oppression
at the hands of a brutal Feminist regime. Their little
groups are so insular that after a while they begin to believe that the
world is somehow listening to their crackpot theories, and somehow
cares. The truth is that by any measure, AngryHarry.com is not even in
the same LEAGUE as Feministing.com. Here are a few traffic and ranking
comparisons:

[She then proceeds to give comparisons between Angry Harry and Feministing based on Alexa Rank, TrafficEstimate score, Google PageRank, Sites linking to each site, and "Estimated Resale Value of Blog" (via an estimation applet developed by Dane Carlson).]

And if that’s not enough, Robin comes up with this gem:

You’re comparing apples and pineapples and wondering why they do not look alike. It’s more like comparing apples to rocks. Anon.
post #3 makes an important (albeit unintentional) point. Women flock
together. They are much more likely to belong to groups, to cooperate.
Men are loners, individualistic. More than 10,000 women-only fitness
clubs like Curves have popped up in the US. Similar clubs for men
failed. Women work together. Men compete with each other.

Feministing is a cooperative with multiple women writers producing 10X the content of AH, who is one loner guy. Feministing allows comments and
participation, AH does not. Feministing puts in the effort to create a
professional image; AH rolls out of bed and puts on the rumpled shirt
from the pile after smelling the armpits. Sure, feministing trades
man-hating barbs and delights in seeing the pathetic MRA rally to back
AH in a meaningless poll, and then fail miserably. But the difference
is that when it comes time to rally to a cause, they will all act
together in unison. MRAs won’t (at least to the same degree). Apples. Rocks:
Look at bob’s comments here and elsewhere. He’s the old bitter guy who
sat in front of the tv for years growing a gut and an increasingly
know-it-all attitude and wondered why his wife started cheating on him.
Same as Masculist Man. Khankersore, others. They don’t want change,
they want to play victim, get the buzz off their rage rants, and
pretend their crackpot uninformed theories pass for knowledge and
principle. They will never create change, nor do they want to. They are
like a cancer to any men’s rights movement because they advocate war
between the sexes, which is not winnable.

In Maryland alone, three desperate fathers have murdered their beautiful children then
taken their own lives this year alone. Laws and procedures put in place
to legitimately protect abused women are now being used
non-legitimately as weapons by scorned and vindictive women (it has
nothing to do with feminism). What we need are husbands, wives, mothers
& fathers to start living by their Christian values of love &
respect, to learn to part amicably, to forgive, to stop seeking
revenge, to put their children’s welfare first.

The MRM cannot help correct this imbalance with women-bashing, chest-pounding,
isolation, unprofessionalism and by tolerating those in their midst who
just preach more hate, more violence. That the AH site is the best the
MRM has to compete with Feministing reveals why the MRM is, by
comparison, functionally impotent.

Bullshit. All of it. Especially the “insular groups”, et. al. part, and the assertion that Angry Harry is the best that we have to compete against the fembots with.

Actually trafficwise and Alexa-wise, Angry Harry is only the MRM’s 8th largest site. To imply that because the MRM’s 8th largest site is smaller than the feminists’ 1st largest site, the MRM congregates in “insular groups”, is “functionally impotent”, et. al., is obviously ludicrous. Yet that is exactly what Robin Steele is trying to sell here.

What would be an honest comparison to see the truth surrounding this matter would be between the feminists’ 1st largest site and the MRM’s 1st largest site. Did Robin do that? No. But let’s see what happens if we did do that. The feminists’ largest site on the internet is indeed feministing.com. The MRM’s largest site is called menarebetterthanwomen.com.

I’ve compiled a list of comparisons for these two sites based on Robin Steele’s criteria. The only thing I didn’t include was the blog value applet comparison, since I believe that applet to be so flawed such that it is essetially worthless, as it gives flawed zero values some of the time, and it’s quite nebulous what it was supposed to be measuring in the first place.

So without further ado, here are the comparisons (Note that these values were taken on Dec 6):

Alexa Ranking (smaller is better):

feministing.com—————-86,016—- menarebetterthanwomen.com–81,159

TrafficEstimate.com (number of visitors in the last 30 days): feministing.com————133,600—- menarebetterthanwomen.com–139,500

Number of Links (per Google): feministing.com—————-17,600—-menarebetterthanwomen.com–206

Google PageRank (larger is better): feministing.com———–6——–menarebetterthanwomen.com–0

Wait, what’s this?! The biggest MRA site on the internet outranks the biggest feminist site on the internet in Alexa rank, and had a higher number of visitors in the last 30 days?

Admittedly, even two years ago this would have been totally unheard of. But this is precisely what has happened now. The biggest internet site for our movement which has almost zero money now outranks the biggest internet site for its opponent (feminism) which has tons of government and private money. And not only that, throughout most of 2006, menarebetterthanwomen.com as the biggest MRA site outranked feministing.com as the biggest feminist site as well.

So it looks like all this feminist fiction spread by Robin Steele and others about the MRM not being able to spread its message through websites and compete with the feminists was a load of you-know-what.

Now there is the fact that feministing.com has a higher number of links to it and a higher Google PageRank than menarebetterthanwomen.com, but in the final calculation, that really doesn’t matter. If X number of people come through 100 links to get to a site, than the result is the same if X number of people come through 10,000 links to get to a site. Or maybe they’re coming through by search engine. It doesn’t matter. If they’re seeing the message, then they’re seeing the message. Ditto goes for Google PageRank.

If we have a good Alexa rank, which is based off of hits and number of pages visited within the site, and a good number of hits overall, that’s all we need. The only other really meaningful thing to check would be Alexa Reach value, which is basically the percentage of internet users reached by the site. And we’re doing great in that department as well. Way better than we did in 2006, too.

Anyway, I also took the initiative to compare the top 10 feminist sites with the top 10 MRA sites in Alexa rank, TrafficEstimate.com score, and number of links according to Google. (I didn’t bother with Google PageRank because it’s based mainly off of links, and it really doesn’t give that much information outside of number of links, and how the site pertains to Google, and I didn’t bother with the value-of-blog applet for reasons I described above.)

And let me tell you, the results of this comparison amazed us and showed us so-called “deluded ones” that we were competing had spread our message to a degree that none of us had anticipated so soon, and that we were in way better competition with the feminists than any of us had henceforth thought.

Feminist vs. MRA site comparison

Dec 6, 2007 (A Preliminary Analysis)

Alexa Rankings (smaller is better):

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com—————-86,016—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–81,159

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-154,376—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–179,200

3. now.org————————-218,202—3. savethemales.ca—————–305,205

4. feministe.us—————–233,894—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–338,633

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—240,110—5. glennsacks.com—-390,983

6. amptoons.com——————–267,609—6. nomarriage.com————-441,478

7. feminist.com———————346,068—7. americanwomensuck.com—–600,019

8. feminist.org———————-372,675—8. angryharry.com—————-688,990

9. msmagazine.com—————–400,945—9. the-niceguy.com—————755,047

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—564,218—10. antimisandry.com————-1,254,137

TrafficEstimate.com (Estimated Number of Visits in the last 30 days):

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com————133,600—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–139,500

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-85,800—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–76,400

3. now.org————————-65,300—3. savethemales.ca—————–49,400

4. feministe.us—————–61,700—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–45,000

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—89,458,000*–5. glennsacks.com–39,400

6. amptoons.com——————–55,200—6. nomarriage.com————-35,000

7. feminist.com———————44,100—7. americanwomensuck.com—–24,800

8. feminist.org———————-41,200—8. angryharry.com—————-20,500

9. msmagazine.com—————–38,500—9. the-niceguy.com—————17,700

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—26,700—10. antimisandry.com————-N/A

*I find this reading to be doubtful, because google.com got a score of 332,068,000, and if this reading is correct, it would mean that this site got over a quarter as much traffic as Google did over the same period, which I find doubtful given both common sense and their Alexa rating.

**I’m very happy, but not surprised, at how well GL at russianwomen.wordpress.com has done. We have spoken many times and I know him well, at least over the internet. His cunning operation of his site and savvy demeanor and writing style have catapulted him into one of the top positions trafficwise in the MRM — giving us another badly needed high traffic site with which to compete against the feminists in the information war.

Links according to Google

——Feminists———————————————-MRA’s—————

1. feministing.com—————-17,600—-1. menarebetterthanwomen.com–206

2. pandagon.blogsome.com——-27,100—2. mensnewsdaily.com———–1,170

3. now.org————————-3,480—3. savethemales.ca—————–566

4. feministe.us—————–770—4. russianwomen.wordpress.com–171

5. shakespearssister.blogspot.com—N/A–5. glennsacks.com–377

6. amptoons.com——————–93—6. nomarriage.com————-325

7. feminist.com———————1,320—7. americanwomensuck.com—–240

8. feminist.org———————-2,800—8. angryharry.com—————-318

9. msmagazine.com—————–759—9. the-niceguy.com—————-16

10.trishwilson.typepad.com—3,170—10. antimisandry.com————-121

I believe one question here remains. If Harry was only the 8th largest site, why did we nominate him? Why didn’t we nominate our biggest site, Menarebetterthanwomen.com? It’s because the majority of us thought that even though he didn’t have the biggest site, out of the bigger sites, his version of the MRA message was the best and most well-written. And we had everything prepared to launch him to victory. Everything. That is, until the polls were rigged. Do we have proof of this? Yes we do, and Lee Raconteur sums it up quite nicely:

“AH had 540 votes when vote displays went secret, FS had 420. You mean to tell me that AH LOST 94 votes and FS gained 299 in one month? That NOT ONE SINGLE ADDITIONAL VOTE was cast for AH in weeks? I’m sorry, you have no credibility. This ‘Award’ was clearly fixed. I simply don’t trust you or the results” -Lee Racounteur

Next time, in Part II, I’ll have an even more damning expose’ of Robin Steele — proof that she is a female supremacist bent on female domination, male subservience, and more.

The Blue Gun Thugs

Bob Allen refers to police as “blue gun thugs”.

You know, I myself am currently in the middle on this issue. Where I’m living right now, there’s 2,500 of us, and only 3 police, and the police have to eat in the same cafeteria as the people eat in. So the police have to look the people in the eye every day. And the people keep a very tight lid on those three men who are the police. So it’s impossible for police here to act like “blue gun thugs”. So therefore, I don’t think “blue gun thugs” is an appropriate term for those three.

But Bob Allen has brought to light on his blog crimes committed by city and suburban police, and also unnecessary trouble that those police have caused.

I have to say that in my time living in suburbia, police have indeed caused trouble and have harassed people for no reason. And in fact, they have indeed caused more problems than they have solved. And as blunt as this may sound, at least as far as the particular suburbian neighborhood that I lived in before I got to college, and that I live in during breaks, the people would be better off without them than with them — were it not for the following fact: I don’t think that the people in that neighborhood could live without them, because those people are decadent, and they, like animals that have been domesticated for their entire lives, don’t know how to defend themselves. They are fat, lazy pigs who have no notion of what freedom is, and prefer tyranny. So that is why the tyranny of the blue gun thugs reigns over my former town.

So without further ado, here are…The Blue Gun Thugs.

Oh My God What The Fuck!?

UPDATE 12-10-07:

Oh, I should have known. The email that he sent got wedged between a bunch of junk mail, and what’s more, it was sent right after I wrote this original post. So I didn’t see it until now. It turns out that he wasn’t mad after all.

The thing is that he needs to get his site back onto his webhost’s production server, and he doesn’t know how long that’ll take.

And he can’t add anything more until that happens.

————————————————————————-

ORIGINAL POST:

I don’t have much time right now, but I’ll explain as concisely as I can, because there is something that needs to be explained.

For awhile, I had been sending sites in to a certain owner of a certain MRA blog mirror (Maus said I’m not allowed to say what it’s called anymore because femcunts and manginas might find it and try to knock it out), and when I would send in the sites, this certain owner of this certain MRA blog mirror would add the ones that he liked.

And what I had planned is that I wanted to unify the MRM, and I wanted to have it so that it would have 500 blogs, rather than the 122 or so blogs that it had originally. So I kept sending in blogs, sending in blogs, sending in blogs. And eventually it got up to 148 blogs. But then I noticed a problem. Part of the feeds on this certain blog mirror were only giving the partial feed rather than the full feed like they used to. So I told this certain owner about it, and I mention to him that he might want to fix it, and I sent in 5 more blogs along with that message.

But something told me, some innate feeling, that he was starting to get pissed off with me. And I didn’t know what it was, but there was just some premonition that I had that he was getting pissed off. But I thought, meh, it’s probably just a premonition.

But when I got onto that site two days later the problem was not fixed, nor was anything added. Instead what happened is it went from 148 blogs back to 132 blogs. My last two submissions had been taken off. (But my first two submissions were still there.) And I was sitting there thinking: “Oh my god what the fuck!?” And I checked my email to see if he sent me anything explaining why this had happened, but there was nothing. And of the blogs that were taken off, Maus’s blog was taken off, and one of Christianj’s blogs were taken off. So it couldn’t have been that the latest 16 authors had complained due to copyright — no — it was that my premonition had been correct — the guy who runs the blog mirror had gotten mad at me. And had decided to take it out by taking off half the stuff that I sent him, and then giving me the silent treatment.

There is a very specific person running that site, with a very specific personality. And I know just what type of personality that he has too, because he has the same personality as a guy I knew at school who graduated last year. They’re fine, until one day they decide they’re now mad at you. And then they go bananas, and they don’t tell you why.

You know, it’s amazing. I had managed to avoid people in the MRM getting mad at me for the entire time I had been in the MRM (with the exception of a semi close call with Drex that lasted maybe 10 seconds, but that was nothing. And as for those Russian women guys, that’s not the MRM, that’s something different). But then it finally happened. Now he’s mad, and I don’t know what to do.

But hey, maybe it’s my fault too. Maybe I was just like the fisherman’s wife in the fisherman’s wife tale, and I just kept wanting that blog mirror to get bigger and bigger, until it reverted back to the way it was before (or at least half the way that it was before).

But on the other hand, he should have sent me a note that he didn’t want me sending any more blogs in if that’s the way he felt. Because now I don’t know what’s going on at all.

Hey! WordPress Deleted My Post!

I had a post up here about the Vagina Monologues at my college and about how childish and hypocritical it is, and I published it and everything, and the next day I come back and it is totally gone!

I’ll show you you censorship fiends! I’m going to write the same post again, and this time I will make an even more scathing attack.

Childish, Just Totally Childish (Vagina Monologues at My College)

(Note: I had written this article before, but WordPress deleted it, so I’m going to have to rewrite it, and make it even more scathing than before.)

I just saw an ad through my college email system saying that there is going to be a student performance of The Vagina Monologues at my college. It’s this radical feminist play where the women all get up on the stage and they pretend that their vaginas have the ability to talk, and they talk about feminist screed and throw some misandry in there too.

I don’t get it, are they trying to run a college, or are they trying to run a circus?

I read awhile back that this feminist play had in it a piece called “The Little Coochie Snorcher that Could” which featured a 24 year old babysitter who had sex with the 13 year old girl that she was supposed to be babysitting. Under statuatory rape laws, which are in existence largely due to feminists, this is statuatory rape, and if it were a 24 year old man having sex with a 13 year old woman, that man would recieve a prison sentence of 20+ years if caught. But a woman caught doing the same thing would likely recieve nothing more than a slap on the wrist, and a play made in her honor where there is applause, cheers, and standing ovations.

A conservative columnist named Robert Swope worked to expose the feminists for blatant hypocracy. Once this was exposed to the public, the feminists received many complaints from disgusted people. To cover their asses, the feminists changed the age of the young girl from 13 to 16.

So they changed her age to 16. So what? In many, many states (including states where “The Vagina Monologues” is performed), a 24 year old having sex with a 16 year old is still in violation of statuatory rape laws. And I can guarantee you that if you were a 24 year old man who had sex with a 16 year old girl in these states you would be locked up for 20 years for statuatory rape just the same. But of course if you’re a woman, it’s just fine, and you get no punishment. You get a play made in your honor which gets awards, applause, and standing ovations. And this time, noone, not even Robert Swope, spoke out against it.

The question is how. How can a highly respected institution teach artificial intelligence, higher mathematics, and physics on one hand, while on the other teach how to whine about your vagina and how to be a feminist hypocrite?

Laboratory Mike provided one answer to that question. He recently found that many times feminist and other leftist organizations directly give grant money to colleges and universities for the establishment of women’s centers (read: feminist centers) and other leftist centers, and use these centers as a base of operations in order to spread feminist and leftist propaganda throughout the institution.

I have long since known of another mechanism which they use. They create a questionnaire with questions like the following: “Do you have a woman’s center?” “Do you have programs which support feminism?” “Do you have student performances of The Vagina Monologues?” And then they dangle grant money in front of the institution, and do not give it to them until the institution can answer all questions in the affirmative. So essentially the administration sells everyone out to feminists and other Marxists in exchange for grant money.

Due to one of these two mechanisms, and I suspect the second, we are now going to have radical feminist baby babble dumbing down our campus.

As SnikerG, who goes to the same college said on antimisandry.com, people need to grow some balls and stop these feminists and Marxists from controlling our college.

I Was Falsely Accused

Like many men who ultimately became MRA’s,
I was falsely accused.

When I was a freshman at college, spring semester (about 2 and a half years ago), there was a female RA in my building who didn’t like me at all. We had a lot of disagreements and a lot of arguments, and I didn’t like her, either. To make a long story short, by the spring semester, things escalated to the point where she would often shout at me, and I wasn’t too bright either, so I often purposely did things to irritate her and egg her on. I would run through the halls, I would say bad things about her behind her back, I would tell everyone about what a bad RA she was, I would insult her and her boyfriend through the Halo 2 mike when I was playing Halo 2 against her boyfriend on system link, etc. Finally, she decided to get rid of me once and for all.

One day I was walking down the street, and I saw her, and she said to me “Luke, I would like to talk to you later.” I didn’t know what was up, but something told me from her tone that she wasn’t up to any good.

So later that day I was back in the residence hall, and then she came along and said “Ok, now I want to talk to you.” So we went out to the middle of the hall and she yelled (something along the lines of):

“Yesterday afternoon, you sent inappropriate, explicit instant messages through AIM to my HIGH SCHOOL AGED SISTER!! xyz123* is my SISTER’S IM ADDRESS, and you sent INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES TO HER!! You knew her address because you SAW IT ON MY BOYFRIEND’S COMPUTER!! You have done so many things to purposely irritate me, and now this is the LAST STRAW!! You have been intruding in my personal life for the LAST TIME, and now this is going to become a BIG ISSUE!!”

(*Note: not the IM address which she actually said, used as a fill-in.)

The entire time I was just standing there frozen with fear. There were several times where she stopped during her rant to try to get a response out of me, but I gave absoultely none because I was so afraid I couldn’t even speak.

Now after she went away, I was very, very curious about why, and on what basis, she would accuse me of sending these messages. Because I knew that I didn’t send them. Curious, I pulled up my AIM log on my computer (I had a program which logged all the AIM messages sent and received from that computer), and horror of horrors, there were the messages in question. And whoever wrote them also used my real name and claimed to be me. I figured someone had gotten into my computer while I was out and the door was unlocked and the computer was still logged in, and wrote the messages, and sent them from my computer.

I had been framed.

Now I wasn’t stupid, and I knew eventually this would be turned into a case which would go in front of the college judicial system, and I might possibly even face criminal charges over it.

And there was evidence on my own computer that would convict me for sure.

So for awhile I didn’t know what to do, and I felt helpless and despaired, and angry at the same time. I wanted to beat the living crap out of whoever set me up, but at the same time it looked like they would get the last laugh and there was nothing I could do about it.

But then I finally managed to raise my head again to my computer screen, and I took a closer look at the messages, and at the timestamps on them. I noticed that the timestamp on the first message was 4:32 PM. And I noticed that the timestamp on the last message was 5:15 PM.

“Wait a minute!” I thought. “I was at Physics Lab cleaning up the apparatus until 4:45 that day! And I was at orchestra rehearsal from 4:55 until 6:00 that day! I have 4 witnesses, including the Professor and the Physics Lab Curator who saw me at Lab, and I have about 50 witnesses who saw me at rehearsal! I know that when I’m called in to defend myself, I’ll have a mountain of ironclad proof that I am innocent.”

So sure enough, about a week later, I received an email from the Dean saying essentially that I was being charged with the offense, and that in two days I was to meet with her in her office to present my preliminary defense against the charges.

At my college they don’t always give the charges special names like they do in the workplace and the legal system. Such was as in my case. So I was charged essentially with “sending explicit IM messages to the high school sister of an RA”.

At my college, for major offenses (what I was accused of is considered a major offense by the college), the accused is called into a Dean’s office where the Dean acts like a grand jury does in the US legal system, and then if you are indicted by the Dean, you go before a special Board, and there you have your trial.

So those two days later came, and I went into the Dean’s office, with my defense totally prepared.
And the Dean said roughly this:

“I’m sure you’ve gotten my email, and you know why you’re here. You have been accused of a very serious offense. You have been accused of sending explicit IM messages to the high school age sister of an RA at this college. I have already heard the complaintant’s side of the story earlier. Now I would like to hear your side of the story regarding this allegation.”

To which I responded roughly:

“Dean __________, I first heard about this on Thursday when she came up to me personally and said that I had sent these messages. She had her voice raised in a very frightful manner, and I was so scared that I stood there frozen and didn’t say anything back to her because I was so scared.

But I did pick up on her statement that the alleged messages were sent ‘yesterday afternoon’.

And when I checked my AIM log from yesterday afternoon, and there they were, the alleged messages!

But Dean ___________, I have ironclad proof that I didn’t send those messages. At the time those messages were sent from my computer, I was not at my computer. I was at Lab and Rehearsal. And I have a Physics Professor, the Physics Lab Curator, as well as 2 other students who will surely testify that I was at Physics Lab from 1:00 to 4:45, and I have about 50 students who would surely testify that I was at violin rehearsal from 4:55 to 6:00 or so. According to the timestamps from the computer log, the messages started at 4:32, and ended at 5:15. From 4:32 to 4:45, I was still at Physics Lab, and from 4:55 to 5:15, I was at violin rehearsal. So I could not have sent those messages that came from that computer because I simply wasn’t there to send them. [At this point I handed the Dean a sheet that I prepared ahead of time containing the messages and the timestamps, as well as a copy of my schedule]. And if necessary, I’m sure AOL, the company that runs AIM, could be reached and could provide data confirming those timestamps. And once that happens, the message time data from AOL, combined with eyewitness testimony that I was at Lab and Rehearsal at the time the messages were sent, will provide an ironclad case proving my innocence beyond any doubt that might be raised against it, if this should go before the Board.”

The Dean looked at me, and thought for awhile, and then she said something along the lines of:

“This incident was indeed very serious, and it is the duty of the college to find and punish the perpetrator of this incident. But you have provided such an absolutely compelling case that if your story does indeed check out with the Physics Professor and Curator, and with the rehearsal leader, that will be enough evidence for me to clear you of this charge, and you will not go before the Board. And if your story does check out with them, this will also be enough evidence for me to instruct this RA to get off of your back for the rest of your time at the college.” [No, I'm not making that last sentence up. My guess is that the Dean was fed up with the way in which the RA acted during the whole incident, and didn't want her to continue to bug me.]

I was so happy I practically went skipping back to the residence hall.

The weeks and months went by, and I never received another email regarding the incident from the Dean, or another summon into her office, so I’m assuming that she did talk to the Physics Lab Professor and the Curator and the rehearsal leader and maybe a few other people, and I know for a fact that my story checked out with all of them because they saw me there, so I suppose I was cleared and that was that.

But as far as many students were concerned, I wasn’t cleared at all. Labels such as “creepy”, and “stalker” and other feminist speak followed me for weeks, even though I had been found innocent. There was even this one student who tried to spread a rumor that I had confessed to the crime even before I got into the dean’s office to defend myself.

I became even more furious because I realized that the college itself, and feminism, with all their “Catch the Campus Stalker” programs (which by the way have yet to actually catch a stalker as far as I know) and “Let’s Accuse The Men!” programs was responsible for making it “acceptable” for this woman to frame me and falsely accuse me. (I’m SURE she was involved in framing me because she is the only one at the college who truly knew her sister’s IM address in the first place. I didn’t. I never saw it on her boyfriend’s computer as she falsely claimed. And if it was on her boyfriend’s computer, and HE was the one who framed me, then he would have told her about it, making it still a false accusation from her.)

And it was feminism that made these kids feel that it was acceptable to throw around humiliating feminist-speak names such as “creepy” and “stalker” at me for weeks, and to spread false, damaging rumors about me regarding the incident, even though I was found innocent of the charge.

Now about a month later I tried to tell my parents about this. I detailed the entire incident to them. But really they were “less than supportive” to say the least. They barely said anything in response to me at all, and what they told me effectively was:

“I’m glad you were found innocent, but the reason why she did this is that you agitated her to the point where she did this. That was bad of you. You need to stay out of other people’s affairs because they might do something like this if you don’t.”

Needless to say, I was shocked at my parents’ pitiful and unsupportive response. Where was the anger? Where was the outrage? Why was their only response to blame me for “agitating her” and legitimizing her unjust actions by saying that she did this because I “agitated her”?

So again, I blame feminism for the fact that my parents were hardly supportive of their son, and had no outrage over this sickening incident.

Anyway, I did a little research and I found out that men most at risk of false accusations are the ones that dated women and that had close interactions with women. And I found out that other men even at my college had been threatened with false accusations out of revenge because they did something that the woman didn’t like.

And although I wasn’t dating a woman in this situation, any idiot can put two and two together and figure out that dating situations and relationships open up an additional can of worms from which these sorts of false accusations can arise.

So obviously after this incident I never again went out of my way to purposely do a lot of agitating little things to anybody at the college again (and especially not women at the college, for obvious reasons).

And also after this incident and another second incident which was even worse, which I may or may not ever tell you about, and also the Duke Lacrosse case after that, I was totally finished with dating American women and women at the college, and with taking them out dancing or doing anything like that with them. It’s just too dangerous for me as a man in this feminazi society after all that has happened to be intimate with these women: the risk of getting falsely accused again, maybe even of something even worse, like sexual assault or rape, is just too high.

So to end I will say:

I am a man who was falsely accused.
Feminism was responsible.